00:00
00:00
TaintedLogic

4,928 Audio Reviews

2,609 w/ Responses

I like the phasing synth and quirky percussion at the beginning. Super catchy and creepy content here - it’s starting to sound like Halloween already! The piece is a bit slow to progress, but the rich atmosphere and rhythmic content help keep me engaged. The drums get a tad buried in the mix at times, although otherwise the production holds up rather well. My main complaint here is probably the lack of variety, especially early on, although the breakdown at 2:36 does help break up the quirky, energetic sections a bit. There’s a good point of arrival at 3:08, and overall you hit the piece home well. Aspects of the chord progression are a bit generic here, but that’s surely counterbalanced by the experimental texture. Overall, this is a really creative and evocative piece, LordAndiso. Still not sure if it’s supposed to be a nightmare or a daydream, but that’s probably a good thing. Keep it up! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
9.25/10

LordAndiso responds:

Thank you soo much :D As always... this keeps me super motivated :3

I love the wonky meter and rich sound design here. The increasing frequency of the electric guitar strums over the first minute gives the piece a subtle sense of build-up, even if it’s fairly slow to progress overall. The prominent bass at 1:23 is really nice, as are the soothing vocals at 1:39 and the subtle build-up into 2:00 or so. When the lyrical vocals finally come in at 2:07, it feels really profound somehow, like everything else up to that point was an attempt to say something as directly as you do at 2:07. The 4-count at the end was a bit cheesy, but also strangely meditative. You definitely broke the fourth wall with this one, Spoonman, and your raw, down-to-earth style has always been really compelling to me. Strong production and phrasing here, too. Thanks so much for participating in the NGADM this year! Been an absolute pleasure hearing your music (and I damn well intend on listening to plenty more of it after the competition, too). ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
8.75/10

I like the dreamy sound design and tranquil mood at the beginning. The fade-in at the beginning threw me off a bit, though - sounds a bit unnatural for a piece like this. That said, the texture comes together really well by :18, and I love the melodies and crisp drums. The rhythmic content and progression are also good, and the organ riff at 1:10 hits the spot after a high-octane first minute of content. This piece is full of variety, and yet it’s so smooth-flowing. The production is also rather good, although at times I would’ve liked to hear a tad more of the drums in the mix. Still, you’ve thoroughly knocked this one out of the park, FJOB. Killer melodies, sound design, mixing, and beats here. Keep it up! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9.5/10

I like the eerie mood at the beginning and the sense of build into :26. The mix at :26 sounds a bit distorted, and I would’ve liked to hear a bit more of the drums. The vocals at :53 fit in well, and their robotic-sounding production matches the rest of the sound design nicely. The drop at 1:19 was catchy, if a little generic, and I like the breaks at 1:47. The airy breakdown at 2:12 was good for some variety, and I really like the rich, apprehensive texture by around 2:30. I appreciate the variations on the vocals at 3:06 and the second drop at 3:32. Throughout the piece, the rhythmic content and gritty sound design are really enjoyable, and the added layering in the treble range on the synth pattern at 4:01 really helps hit the piece home. Overall, this is a catchy and compelling track, DenPelm. Aspects of the arrangement and harmonic framework are a bit cliche, but the synths are well-polished, and you’ve kept my head bobbing and foot tapping throughout. Keep it up! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
8.5/10

I like the majestic riff at the beginning and the gradual swell in energy and volume over the first minute of the piece. The melodies and sound design are beautiful as always with you, Papkee. The return to the pitter-patter piano riff at 1:15 or so was very gracefully phrased, and the middle section of the piece strikes a great balance between a sense of wonder and a sense of anticipation. The stop-start transition at 2:36 actually works rather well too, and the final climax at 2:42 is characteristically orgasmic. The mixing is not perfect here - I wanted to hear a bit more of the shakers during the final minute and more of the woodwinds in the places where they came in (:45, notably). Otherwise, this is a top-notch track, Papkee. By all means, keep it up! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
9.75/10

I like the dreamy arpeggios at the beginning and the rich bass line at :15. There’s a nice subtle sense of build into :34, and the texture fills in nicely by then as well. The piece has a really bright tone to it, and at times actually seems to be missing some frequencies in the lower register. I also feel like you didn’t quite release all of the tension that you built up in the piece over the first 1.5 minutes. Instead, by 1:45 the piece has descended into this eerie, meditative texture which suggests a lot of lingering tension, maybe even a transition into something more sinister-sounding. That said, I’m a steady admirer of your knack for phrasing and cinematic flair. Beautiful sound design and melodies as always, Lordant, and the production here is quite clean as well. Keep it up! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9/10

I like the jumpy riff at the beginning and the atmosphere that comes in at :05. The airy guitar riff at :15 is super nice too, and overall the sound design and progression is distinctly “Beyond Our Eyes-style.” :D The melodic refrain at 1:05 is nice, and the compositional details here are pretty neat, like the descending line at 1:04. There are still long sections of this piece where the texture is mostly rhythmic in nature, especially early on. I really like the bridge at 2:21 with the prominent bass and added electronic elements. I feel like the piece is missing a climactic section towards the end to hit the piece home, and that at times the arrangement is a bit formulaic, with a lot of transitions made with quick drum fills as opposed to broader phrasing techniques. Despite the rich atmosphere, the mix holds up incredibly well, though. Really clean and well-balanced production here. Overall, this is a catchy and well-produced track with your trademark killer sound design. Keep it up, BOE! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
8.75/10

BeyondOurEyes responds:

Great appreciate the score and feedback as always! I do wanna revisit the ending of this song for sure and build it out more cinematically rather than it stop as abruptly as it does, I just ran out of time lol but Imma jump on it and make some other tweaks very soon!

Wow, been a while since I heard from you! I like the spacey atmosphere at the beginning and your characteristically crisp drums. The energetic vocals are engaging and fun, and the drop, while a little minimal, was catchy and well-varied. The arrangement is a little generic, but the production quality is especially good, and I like how you switch up the drop the second time around. Strong track, Spitfya! Hope to hear more of you on Newgrounds in the near future. ^_^

I like the cutesy, echo-y chords at the beginning and the dreamy pads that start fading in at around :14. Love the conversational tone of the vocals at :27 too. I also applaud the relatable lyrics and the production quality. The instrumental tracks could’ve used a little more variety, and the arrangement here is a little generic. The synth solo at 2:55 is awesome, though, and I also like the subtle variations on the final chorus. Overall, really solid effort here, Zane! Pleasure having you in the contest this year, and congratulations on your success in it (and NGADM too!). ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
9.5/10

I like the quirky beats at the beginning - the blissful-sounding lead, cutesy harmonies, and heavy bass actually work really well together. The texture sounds a tad thin for the first couple of minutes - some stronger drums and a little more room in the mix for the middle-range frequencies could help. The dissonance at 1:16 actually works really well to advance the progression of the piece, and I really enjoy the rhythmic content throughout. The fairly thin texture is a bit of a turn-off for me here, and at some point you could’ve balanced out the staccato-y synth lines and short-lived flourishes with some smoother pads or something. Still, I really like the sound design, progression, and beats here. Full credit for instrumentation and originality for sure. :D Thanks for coming out to the NGUAC this year, xkatttt! Always a pleasure hearing your work. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
8.25/10

xkatttt responds:

Thanks for your review! Glad you enjoyed and super grateful to have made it this far in the contest :)

Hi. I'm Andrew. Audio portal junkie since 2010, supporter since 2017. I always want to improve what I do! I make music, run the NGUAC, post poetry on BBS, and am the all-time #2 audio reviewer. I love this site, and I want to make it the best I can! ^_^

Andrew Mikula @TaintedLogic

Age 26, Male

Policy Research

Bates College

Wellesley, Massachusetts

Joined on 8/16/12

Level:
21
Exp Points:
4,808 / 4,900
Exp Rank:
9,921
Vote Power:
6.31 votes
Audio Scouts
10+
Rank:
Police Officer
Global Rank:
13,941
Blams:
63
Saves:
626
B/P Bonus:
10%
Whistle:
Silver
Trophies:
4
Medals:
142
Supporter:
7y 2m 14d
Gear:
1