TaintedLogic's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[Beyond a Journey]

I like the hushed atmosphere at the beginning, although the heavy, wet percussion sample at :04 seemed a tad out-of-place. I also wasn’t a huge fan of the clap - it sounded a bit generic, thin, and distracting. I think you could’ve used a stronger transition into :07, even a simple sweep or reverse crash or something. I like the fuller texture at :22, even if the bass was a tad loud. There’s a tad too much reverb in the mix, although it doesn’t negatively affect the quality until about 1:26. The sound here is pretty cool overall, especially with the eerie synth at :51, but the lack of harmonic depth and variety is probably my main concern here. The main riff gets very predictable after a while, to the point that even the minimalist texture at 1:51 is pretty refreshing. The bass at 3:05 sounds a bit harsh in my ears, but I liked the injection of energy at 3:22. You do some great work with the atmosphere and vocal effects in that last section, but unfortunately the rest of the piece doesn’t sound quite as dynamic and refreshing as that last section. The ending also cuts off pretty suddenly, leaving this piece feeling structurally incomplete despite being over 4 minutes long. Overall, nice work with the sound design, balance of the texture, and atmosphere, but I think the composition was seriously underwhelming here. I was looking for a little more harmonic depth and variety than this. Still, you absolutely nailed the quirky mood here. Keep at it, LN! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
6.75/10

[endK - Ruby Saloon]

I like the bouncy synths at the beginning, but the rhythm is a little hard-to-follow at times here. The melodic content at :13 is really fun, and definitely ties in well with the thematic content. The production quality here is great. Really well-balanced, crisp, clear, and full texture, and the mix is super loud and blends well. The re-intro at 1:05 is nice, albeit short-lived. I wanted to hear more of the walking bass at 1:10 and the rich atmosphere before you dove back into the melodic content. I also would’ve liked to hear a little more variation in the melodic content during the second refrain, although there’s a lot of harmonic variety in this piece as it is. The fast pace of the progression is really fun, and I love the sound design, production, and variety here too. Great work overall, EndK! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9.5/10

endKmusic responds:

Yeah, second part was kinda copy/paste, but it was a tough one nevertheless.
Didn't want to create more mess (I tend to do that >.<) with new ideas since I spent a lot on referencing this one.
Much thanks for all the input TL, appreciate your words as always. :)

[everything.]

I like the smooth synths at the beginning. The tone of the piece is both quirky and melancholy, which is a good combo. The percussion at :17 is creative, although the phone effects and static-y atmosphere at :35 kinda threw me off the flow. I would’ve liked to hear a stronger build-up into the climactic section at the 1-minute mark, although the powerful pads and danceability of that section was pretty cool. The sound design here is really cool overall, although I was looking for some stronger melodic content in here somewhere. The bouncy energy at 1:53 is nice, and despite the somewhat weak kick, the production quality in this piece is super high. The distorted vocals at 2:26 seem a tad out-of-place, and make for a pretty choppy stop-start transition ino 2:30. The chord progressions in this piece can be a bit generic and, despite the amazing atmosphere, sound design, and mixing here, I can’t help but feel that the composition is a tad underwhelming in some regards. The melodic instrument at 3:14 is really cute and quaint, but I think you seriously overdid it with the atmospheric breaks with the bizarre vocals. Overall, this is strong work, especially with the production quality and sound design, but the arrangement is pretty choppy and some of the compositional details didn’t quite work for me. Keep at it, BurneMusic! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
8.75/10

BurneMusic responds:

Thanks, I agree with what you've said for sure
I'm honestly very surprised that you scored this so highly, hopefully I'll be able to impress more in the future :)

the track is pretty awful I'm aware

[Fractal Footsteps]

I like the frantic piano harmonies at the beginning and the energy here. I think a lot of the harmonies here sound really dissonant, starting with the line at :14, and the drums are a little haphazard and overwhelming at times. The texture feels really incoherent at times, and the progression takes a lot of sudden twists and turns, like the abrupt transition at :41. During the busier sections, the mix can also sound really muddy. I think you tried to do a little too much with this piece. I’d encourage you to try consolidating your compositional ideas a little more. Try working with only 3-4 percussion sounds at a time, and constructing harmonic riffs around a simple chord progression that only uses 5-6 pitches in total. That should give you a solid baseline of a harmonic framework. There are certainly moments here where you have a strong harmonic paradigm in place here, like from around :45 to 2:10, but otherwise there’s not a lot of cohesion in the harmonic patterns of these riffs. It can be hard to construct a meaningful harmonic progression if you don’t know a lot about music theory, but until you get a feel for how to keep the arrangement of you track cohesive and well-balanced, I’d recommend keeping things simpler. Originality is important in music, but I think it’ll be good for you to prioritize creating core harmonic motifs in the near future. Please PM me if you have any questions, or just want me to review some of your other work. :) Keep at it, BALDORF!

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
.75/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.25/1
Composite score
4/10

BALDORF responds:

I appreciate the feedback.

You seem to have a clearly defined idea of what music should be. I don't fit into that definition.

Aside from mixing and not being much of a drummer, everything is in the order I want it to be. If you don't like it, that's fine. But please, don't tell me how to make my music, let alone tell me to limit my use of notes to 6. It's insulting.

[[IV]Nigdzie]

I like the relaxing mood at the beginning and the emotional quality of the strings at :11. The piece leaves a lot of room for climax and contrast at the beginning, and I think you did a great job with the shape and phrasing in this piece. The melodic content is beautiful here, although I think the strings overwhelm the harmonies in the texture at times. Still, the harmonic content is gorgeous, and the sense of catharsis at 1:26 really hits this piece home. I suppose I would’ve liked to see a tad more structuring, though. The one-climax model you have here is rarely as effective as a piece that has a bit more ebb and flow over time. If I can describe the structural direction of your piece in one word (in this case, “parabolic”), that’s a sign that you need a tad more complexity to the arrangement. Still, the sound design, atmosphere, and production are all excellent here. You know how to tell a story with a piece of music, which is a very underrated skill on Newgrounds imo. Keep it up! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
9/10

IglicaV responds:

Thanks a lot! I am still working on the structure of my songs, and I agree with every single thing that you have mentioned. The one-climax thing came from some of Inon Zur's work that I was hoping to imitate, so it seems I still have a lot to learn if I want to make it worth the shortened lenght of the track. Thanks again for the review :)

[Dark Reflections]

I like the bassy atmosphere at the beginning and the pensive synths that fade in shortly thereafter. The pause at :09 interrupted the flow a bit, but you smooth it over pretty well with that airy percussion. The drums at :19 sound a bit gritty and unpolished by contrast with the instrumental tracks, but I’m beginning to like the sense of climax at around :50. The balance at the drop at :59 is a bit strange, with the rhythmic percussion kept solidly in the background and a lot of dynamism in the texture between the synths and increasing prominence of the bass. Despite functioning like an emotional height in the texture, this first drop never really feels like a stable point of release, which I think might’ve been a bit of a mistake. That said, I like the re-intro at 1:23 and the moody vibe of the somewhat celtic-sounding instruments there. You do a great job with the phrasing and sense of ebb and flow throughout this section, which makes the climax into 2:21 feel all the more intense. The second drop has some of the same balance issues as the first one, though, with a very loud bass and jarringly quiet percussion, albeit solid melodic content. The sound overall still feels somewhat contained, but the arrangement of the piece is still effective for delivering a sense of conclusiveness to the piece. The outro seemed a bit short-lived, though, which I think was a missed opportunity to maximize the emotional appeal of the piece. Overall, this piece has solid production, instrumentation, and atmosphere, despite my concerns with some of the details of the composition. Keep at it, LordJabeebus! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.25/1
Composite score
8/10

LJTLegendaryL responds:

Thanks for the feedback ^^! I'm glad I did better than last time and I'll make note of how I make the elements interact with each other so it is possible to achieve easy listening and a better hook for the drops along with improvements to mastering.

[X Sentinel - The Light Comes Alive]

The gritty bass at the beginning and vocal samples are nice. The synth melodies and heavy kick add to the feeling of apprehension here as well. Good sense of climax into :33, and I like how the piece resets itself a bit thereafter. The piece is a little slow to develop at times, and the drop at 1:03 feels a tad minimal and abrupt. I wasn’t sure I liked the synth at 1:03. It had a bit too much layering and aggression for the otherwise smooth vibe of the piece. That said, overall the sound design and atmosphere here are solid, and the part at 1:30 attests to that. The production quality is probably the strongest element of this piece, and the section at 2:30 helps give this piece a strong sense of finality and resolve. The emotional appeal of the piano outro was a nice touch, too. Overall, solid work with the composition, production, and atmosphere. There are some cool compositional details here too - the echo of a melody at 3:28 comes to mind. Keep up the good work, Jimmypig! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9/10

Jimmypig responds:

Thanks for the review! I'm happy with that

[Far Away]

I like the dreamy, pensive vibe at the beginning and the smooth vocals. I like the lyrics, too. Did you write them yourself, or are the vocals sampled from somewhere? The production quality is smooth, even if there’s a bit too much reverb in the texture at times. I like the sense of climax into 1:10, but I think the piece never quite got to the cathartic melodic moment I was hoping for. The lead at 1:24 sounds very in-the-chords, and overall I think you missed an opportunity to maximize the emotional appeal of the piece with a soaring melodic section or emotional bridge. The closest you come to doing that is at 2:07, but it’s at a bit of a strange spot in the arrangement, towards the very end. At the very least, I would’ve created a more distinct outro here and fleshed out the composition just a tad more. This piece is short enough that you had some time to work with in terms of creating more emotional contrast in this piece. Still, the production is solid, the sound design is cool, and the atmosphere is really languid and pleasant. Keep at it, TenodiBoris! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
8.5/10

TenodiBoris responds:

Yes I did write the lyrics for the song, and also hiered singer and did the recordings, it was nice experience for me. Thanks for the review :)

[CRY.NN - Impale]

I like the gritty bass at the beginning, even if it sounded a tad dry and repetitive. The beat at :10 is nice, and I like the sense of climax into :21. The texture is still pretty minimal, though, and lacks fill in the mid and treble range. You have a good sense of rhythm and progression, but I think the composition in this piece is pretty bland overall. The production quality is good, but I wanted to hear more melodic content and harmonic depth. The dreamy bridge at 1:17 is nice, and I like how the piece maintains its ominous edge during that section. You do a good job with the phrasing and sense of direction through this section, especially with the volume automations and such. The pitch-bending and other mixing effects at 2:10 are cool, but I was a little disappointed with the anti-climax at 2:21. After that, there’s very little novel content in this piece. Overall, the production quality, sound design, and atmosphere are solid, but I really would’ve liked to see a more fleshed out composition and full texture here. Keep at it, CryNN! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.25/1
Composite score
6/10

CryNN responds:

Thanks!
I hope i will learn something from you, and i hope that i make my tracks better at some point!

[Cj'Pit - Light In The Darkness]

I like the emotional appeal of the piano at the beginning and the smooth guitar and minimal percussion at :13. There’s a really smooth and soulful vibe to this piece, as enhanced by the electric guitar melodies and strong sense of atmosphere. The mix is a little wide for my tastes, but overall the production quality is really strong too. You also have a good sense of rhythm, harmony, and progression. The fade-out ending is a bit lazy, but the flowiness of this piece is one of its strongest qualities. I would’ve liked to hear a little more structural variety, though, as after a certain point the energy level in this piece is a near-constant, which isn’t great for keeping me engaged. The melodic content might make up for that, but overall this piece would still be stronger with an emotional breakdown or climactic solo or something. That’s my main complaint here, though. This is really strong work overall. Keep at it, Pit80! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
8.75/10

pit80 responds:

thanks for feedback.