00:00
00:00
TaintedLogic

5,129 Audio Reviews

2,717 w/ Responses

2 reviews are hidden due to your filters.

I like the dark mood at the beginning. The part at :18 hits hard. The distorted vocals at :36 are cool, and somewhat morbid. I love the intensity, although the piece is a little slow to develop. After around 1:30, I think you’ve overdone it a bit with the angry vocals. It seemed nice and climactic up to that point, and I was itching for some melodic content. At 2:35, you seem to switch up the beat a bit and try to take the piece in a different direction structurally, but I think the piece needs a little structural relief at this point. The vocals also cut off pretty suddenly at 4:12, as do the guitars at 4:31. I think you need to give this piece a little more shape. The experimental texture is really cool, but without any instrumental variety I don’t think it can function very well as a stand-alone piece. One thing I do like about the piece is that I can hear everything in the mix clearly throughout. There are a lot of neat ideas here, but I think the arrangement needs some cleaning up here. Keep at it, man!

7/10

I like the percussion at the beginning. Samples of people applauding may have been a little over-the-top, but didn’t really detract from the piece either. Interesting texture for the rest of the first minute. Interesting use of filtering, too. The melodic content at around the 1-minute mark is really refreshing, and I love the hats at 1:12. They add a lot of pop to the high end of the frequency range. The mix is really clean and atmospheric - everything reverberates really nicely. The rhythmic breaks at 1:58 are nice in their own way, too - it’s like they pushed the “reset” button on the track. I like the part at 2:53 a lot too. The pads at 2:55 sounded a bit generic, but they blended well with the rest of the piece too. I think this piece has a really unique sound design - there’s a diversity of influences you seem to have drawn from here. The claps at 3:59 also seem a bit cliche, though. Smooth transitions and cool structure here. I suppose one issue I had was with the lack of melodic development - there just wasn’t a lot of fresh material during the last ⅓ of the piece or so to offer much of a sense of climax. As relaxed and smooth as the melodic content here is, I think you could’ve taken more risks compositionally with this piece. I also think the melodic content is a bit repetitive. Still, wonderful job with the atmosphere and instrumentation. This is a strong piece. Keep it up, man! ;)

9/10

I like the bright piano at the beginning and the powerful chords. There’s a good sense of climax into :30, and a nice relaxed atmosphere. The rhythms of the open hat and bass at :45 don’t mesh very well together in my opinion. The melodic content at 1:32 was really enjoyable, though. The pause at 2:05 is a little awkward, and the music comes back in VERY quietly relative to the loud refrain before it. I think this is a well-structured and smooth-flowing piece overall, though. I like the mid-range synths that play on each downbeat during the second refrain. The texture is rich, full, and refreshing throughout. The ending came on a little suddenly, though, and you may have overused the sweeps at a couple of points in the piece. The sound design and atmosphere of the piece are quite enjoyable, and overall the mastering is solid as well. Keep up the good work!

8.75/10

Wick3dRabbit responds:

Thanks a lot! I'll take your advices and improve in my future songs :)

The beginning of this piece was pretty interesting. Sounded like you were going for something a little more atmospheric, but I think you needed some more reverb to make that happen. I think the beat at :19 is a little too busy. The synth at :39 struck me as pretty generic, and also didn’t add much to the musicality of the piece. By around the 1-minute mark, I’m really itching for some melodic content. The transition at 1:17 was pretty rough - very sudden change in instrumentation. Compositionally, you could’ve done many more creative things with this piece. The atmosphere is pretty good, but the arpeggiated synth you have playing through most of the piece is not enough to keep me engaged. The piece has very little sense of direction, very little shape or variety, and also doesn’t feel very conclusive by the end. I think it’d be good for you to try centering your next piece around a strong melody. A strong melody generally has a well-varied rhythm, and isn’t too fast-paced like the arpeggios here, among other characteristics. I think that composing a melody-driven piece would help you improve your composition skills. The piece isn’t all bad, though. I didn’t notice any problems with the mixing or balance, and the piece is pretty catchy while simultaneously having a rich atmosphere. Keep at it, man!

5/10

vince-galaxy responds:

Really appreciate the honest review. Thank you so much for inviting me to take part in the NGADM!!

I like the energy and mood at the beginning. The breaks at :15 are pretty cool, too. I think the drums need to stand out a little more in the mix. Some more equalization and compression could help, and if that’s not enough stereo widening is the way to go. I like the synths, although I think the texture could stand to be thicker during the first minute or so. The vocal sample at the 1-minute mark does a good job in aiding the transition to 1:01, and I like the melodies at 1:16. I think that synth detracts from the clarity of the bass line a bit, though - again, more equalization is required. One thing the track lacks is a lot of structural variety - sounds very energetic throughout, and there’s not much phrasing or dynamic changes. The drums could also use a little more...creativity. The piece is very catchy, though. You have a good sense of rhythm and harmony. I think your chief areas of focus going forward should be the mixing and filling out the texture (with pads, layered synths, reverb, etc.). Keep at it, man. ;)

7/10

I like the atmosphere and tranquil mood. The drum part at :17 is creative. The melodic content is very relaxing and smooth. The kick drum sounds a little thin, although perhaps this isn’t the sort of piece to have an especially bassy kick anyway. My main problem with the piece is that it has a sense of continuity without much structural variety or shape. The ending is pretty sudden, almost as if it was intended to loop. I’m not entirely sure it’s structurally complete, either. The instrumentation and mood of the piece are both really enjoyable, though. Good job.

8.25/10

I like the flutes at the beginning. The string pizzicatos sound pretty fake, but the guitar was a nice way of smoothing over the texture. I’m getting a bizarre sense of different moods occurring at once from the texture at :12. The flutes sound regal and light, while the pizzicatos are sharp and rhythmic, and the guitar adds some flow and harmonic depth. I wasn’t sure what to make of the mood/atmosphere you were going for. I also think you need a stronger transitions at :37 and 1:08, but I did like the direction it was heading in then. I thought the percussion at 1:08 was a little weak, and sounded a bit thin in the mix. The piece is lacking strong melodic content until 1:38. The mixing is quite impressive, though, and 1:38 reveals that. The mood of the piece actually comes together pretty well, but I don’t think this piece is structurally complete. It ends pretty abruptly, and only really has one emotional height. It also doesn’t have a ton of coherence, and seems to be changing directions a lot. Despite these criticisms, the melodic content is beautiful and the texture is well-balanced and full almost always. If you think a little bit more about the progression and flesh out the structure a little more, this could be quite the engrossing cinematic piece. Keep at it, man!

7.5/10

I like the string arpeggios at the beginning. They have a nice underlying intensity and drive. The sample is actually pretty good, too, although I can still tell it’s fake. The piece is really slow to progress compositionally, though. You switch up the instrumentation a lot without warning, although I did like the melody at :56. I think the drums could’ve been a bit stronger, just to give the song a little more bite. The song has a feeling of continuity, which I would’ve liked to see you break down at some point. The arrangement doesn’t have a lot of shape or phrasing, and the energy level is very similar throughout. Experimenting more with dynamics and filtering could be a great way of expanding your compositional repertoire a bit. I also would’ve liked to see you vary the main melody a bit. There are a lot more creative things you could’ve done with the composition, although I did like the sub-bass and beats. You have a good sense of rhythm and harmony. Keep at it, man!

6.75/10

PureJoy responds:

Wow, thank you so much for your complete argumentation ! I'll take into consideration your whole analysis ^^

I like the texture at the beginning. You overused the crashes, though, and I think you could stand to take a little treble off of the crashes as well. The synth at :33 wasn’t my favorite - seems like it belongs in a cheesy, old-fashioned trance track. The piano at :52 and the melody synth at 1:08 also seemed a bit generic. The piece had a constant sense of energy, but I really would’ve liked to see you have a section with more structural relief in here somewhere. To some extent, 2:17 serves that purpose, but you could still do a lot more with phrasing, dynamic contrast, and changes in energy. I like the spacey and somewhat ambiguous ending, but the structure of the piece didn’t quite come together for me. There’s not a lot of melodic development or other variation later in the piece to build off the first half. I also thought there were several moments of dissonances in the harmonies at 1:08 that didn’t quite work for me. Overall, elements of the composition might need cleaning up, especially with the harmonies and variety. The mixing was pretty good, although the kick does get a little buried during the busier sections of the piece. The piece has a really interesting quirky mood - that was probably my favorite part of it. I suggest you keep working on this - you’re most of the way there with all of the major parameters. Keep at it, man. ;)

7/10

I like the cute synths and upbeat mood at the beginning. The melodic content at :20, although fleeting, is enjoyable, and the pitch-bending on that synth that first comes in at :26 is really refreshing. The drums could’ve been mastered a bit louder IMO, but it didn’t detract from my enjoyment of the piece much at all. The texture is so full and everything blends together really well. The breakdown with the strings is gorgeous, and really gives the piece a nice sense of structural contrast. The variations on the melody at 2:07 were great as well. Honestly, outside of the contest, this is just everything I look for in a piece of electronic music. Excellent work! You’ve set the standard high, my friend. Fave’d and DL’d. By all means, keep it up! :D

9.75/10

Namice responds:

thanks ^_^

Hi. I'm Andrew. Audio portal junkie since 2010, supporter since 2017. I always want to improve what I do! I make music, run the NGUAC, post poetry on BBS, and am the all-time #2 audio reviewer. I love this site, and I want to make it the best I can! ^_^

Andrew Mikula @TaintedLogic

Age 27, Male

Policy Research

Bates College

Wellesley, Massachusetts

Joined on 8/16/12

Level:
22
Exp Points:
5,220 / 5,380
Exp Rank:
9,799
Vote Power:
6.40 votes
Audio Scouts
10+
Rank:
Police Officer
Global Rank:
14,077
Blams:
63
Saves:
626
B/P Bonus:
10%
Whistle:
Silver
Trophies:
5
Medals:
142
Supporter:
8y 3m 28d
Gear:
1