00:00
00:00
TaintedLogic

4,934 Audio Reviews

2,611 w/ Responses

I really like the emotional appeal of the beginning melodies and the sound design. The plucked strings are a particularly nice touch, and the brief dissonance at :47 serves as a great transition into the section with the swelling string chords. The melodies at 1:15 felt like a true moment of triumph - like a kid recovering from cancer is performing in a ballet recital. If I had to complain about one thing here, it might be that the ending came on a bit suddenly. But otherwise, the sound design, production quality, composition, and atmosphere are all top-notch here. By all means, keep it up, A145! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
9.75/10

I like the percussion at the beginning and the dramatic orchestral hits. The texture is a bit dry, and might need a bit of reverb or other mixing effects to give it some “pizzazz.” I like the sharper attack on every downbeat - it gives the piece a nice subtle punch. The refrain with the prominent string melody is nice, and the dramatic pause at :58 was a nice touch. I like the injection of energy at 1:04, although the drums start to duck under the mix during the final half of the piece. You might try putting a compressor on them. But with the additional layering of instruments and key changes later on, there’s plenty of variety to keep me engaged here. The downtempo piano outro was another good decision, and the way the tempo slowed down a little at the very end is another one. If I had to complain about one thing, it’d probably be the sound design. The synths here sound a bit unpolished and generic, while a lot of the orchestral-sounding instruments are clearly inauthentic. That said, your composition skills are very strong. You’ve clearly demonstrated a lot of advanced ways of creating variety, including a really smooth modulation, a careful attention to volume levels, and some snazzy transitions. Overall, solid work, 7a9s7! Keep it up. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.25/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
7.5/10

I like the bouncy mood and crisp beats at the beginning. The kick has a little too much bass in it for my tastes - some more mid-tones might help it pop in the mix more - but that’s a nitpicky thing. In general, I think the drums could be a bit louder too. The cutesy vocals starting at around :30 are great, although it’s pretty difficult to make out the lyrics. The harmonic content gets a tad repetitive after a while. Especially with the frantic tempo, it might’ve been nice to have an extended breakdown earlier in the piece (like at 2:46). I think my favorite element of this piece is the transitions - the one with the dissonant piano chords at 2:57 stands out, but there’s also a neat one at 1:54 that fits with the energy of the piece really well. Overall, solid effort all around, 3xBlastMx! Despite my minor complaint with the drums, the production is really strong here, and the triumphant-sounding synths, energy, and blissful vocals make this track irresistible. Keep it up! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
8.5/10

I like the moody pads at the beginning. The woodwinds and brass sound pretty inauthentic - iit might be advisable to replace them with instruments that are meant to sound synthetic. The mix could be a tad crisper - the strings at :40 or so don’t come through particularly well, although you’ve balanced things out much better at :56. I like the busy beat at 1:38 and the burst of intensity at 1:49, although that’s another spot where the harmonies are ducking under the mix a bit. You might need to get a little stricter with the equalizers here, and also scale back the reverb on the pads and strings at some points. The extended pause at 3:20 threw me off a bit, and I thought the transition back into the refrain with the gradual fade-in could’ve been more creative. The key change at 3:44 was a good idea, although the new harmonies at 4:05 clash with the main melody a bit. I like the transition at 4:25, especially compared to some of the risers earlier, and the vocal sample you incorporated during the last minute of the piece was a welcome change. That little sitar riff towards the end is another element that probably needed a boost in the mix, but I like how you wound down the piece with the smooth-sounding guitar. Overall, there’s a lot to like here between the catchy rhythmic content, memorable melodies, and variety in the sound design. I still think the mixing needs more attention, as well as some of the arrangement details, but overall you’ve put a solid effort into this track, with a solid result. Keep at it, 3manon! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
7/10

3manonMusic responds:

Thank you for your constructive criticism ^-^ will definitely work on these points in the future

I like the organ stabs and percussion at the beginning, although the mix is a bit muddy. It seems you’re combining a lot of samples with very different instrumentation here, and the result is a tad disjointed. I like the lo-fi groove at :23 with the vinyl scratches. The vocal samples were a little overused, and they also had very different positions in the mix, with “my spider sense is tingling” at :44 much louder and more up-front than the others around it. The vocal samples are the only thing driving the narrative aspect of the piece forward, and most of the melodic elements of the track (like the orchestral flourish at 1:00) seem to also come from the sampled content. Overall, the beat is cool, and a lot of the sound design here is well-selected, but this piece has a long way to go in terms of harmonies and progression before it’s a well-rounded original composition in my opinion. I’d challenge you to tell a story with your music without relying so much on vocal samples - add and subtract some instruments to the backing track over time, use drums and risers to build up intensity during certain parts, or increase/decrease the pace at which the notes play to change the energy level etc. When you feel like you’ve done that, feel free to send me a PM, and I’ll give you some more feedback. Until then, thanks for coming out to the NGADM, 15grams!

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
.75/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
5/10

What the hell, I need a break from judging.

I love the inspirational tone at the beginning and the swell into :06. The twittery synth line and warm, hearty strings mesh well together, and the production quality is fantastic as always with you. The cutoff of the beat and synths at :36 was a bit sudden, but I like how the modulation at :48 injects a new sense of energy into the piece. During the final section at 1:06, I wanted the strings to be a bit more prominent in the mix, as I feel like they're playing the more climactic/melodic line there. Still, the sound design and compositional details are superb here. Keep it up, Bosa! ^_^

Bosa responds:

yeah I may have popped the clutch at :36 but we were still movin lol. At 1:06 I can understand your feelings on that, I guess I was trying not to push past the ceiling too much while still not detracting from the strings.

Thank you so much for taking the time to listen and leave me a review! I love to hear what your thoughts are

I really like the rhythmic content and sound design here. The instruments are groovy, and the beat is creative. The texture is a bit minimal at times, often because the melodic instruments are very staccato-y and thin-sounding, but you clearly have a good sense of harmony and progression. The call-and-response thing among the several different leads from :13 to :40 or so (and other places) is probably my favorite aspect of the piece. It's a really effective way of creating variety in a piece that otherwise has pretty much one simple chord progression. That said, the relaxing mood and spacey atmosphere are big pluses, and I also think the breakdown section at 2:03 was an effective way of adding some variety. Solid work, dude! Keep it up. :)

EmsDeLaRoZ responds:

Thank you very much for the feedback, i'll keep working for the better

Haunting! I love the atmosphere at the beginning and the furtive piano shortly thereafter. The strings are warm and rich-sounding, and the mood is alternately filled with wonder and tranquility. The piece is a tad slow to develop at times, but I love the subtle key change and the dark string riffs at 2:02. You're really playing up the dynamic contrast and cinematic flair of the piece by the woodwind solo at 2:30ish. Really captivating work, Everratic. The way you use the music to tell a story has grown into one of your strongest qualities as a musician. Best of luck in AIM! ^_^

Everratic responds:

Thanks for the review!

I like the 80s-style synths and melodic contour. The rhythm is a bit hard to follow at times - it might help if you had a rhythmic instrument playing along with the melodies early, even a kick drum or something. The harpsichord-sounding thing at the downbeats at :55 is a bit grating - couldn't hurt to scale back the attack there. The dreamy sequence starting at 1:16 is nice, and the gritty synth bass complements it well at 1:20. You clearly have a good sense of harmony and syncopation. The progression seems a tad rushed at times - there are a lot of distinct sections of the piece in a relatively short time. But the sound design is fun and the melodies are killer. You earned yourself a scout, my friend. Keep it up! ^_^

Magicnumber69420 responds:

Thank you so much! I have to agree, the part at 55 might be a bit too aggressive. However, I have noticed the issue around the lack of percussion, and that's why I experimented more, and made my second track! I think it sounds way better and more organized, just a bit short!

Love the relaxed mood at the beginning. The percussion starting at :39 sounds a tad dry in comparison, but once the rest of the beat comes in at around 1:10 it makes it less conspicuous. This piece is a bit slower to progress than some of your other tracks, but it definitely has the same engrossing atmosphere and well-balanced mix. I especially enjoyed the twittery solos at 2:57 and the added white noise during the breakdown section. Keep at it, LAPSE! ^_^

Hi. I'm Andrew. Audio portal junkie since 2010, supporter since 2017. I always want to improve what I do! I make music, run the NGUAC, post poetry on BBS, and am the all-time #2 audio reviewer. I love this site, and I want to make it the best I can! ^_^

Andrew Mikula @TaintedLogic

Age 27, Male

Policy Research

Bates College

Wellesley, Massachusetts

Joined on 8/16/12

Level:
21
Exp Points:
4,848 / 4,900
Exp Rank:
9,941
Vote Power:
6.32 votes
Audio Scouts
10+
Rank:
Police Officer
Global Rank:
13,963
Blams:
63
Saves:
626
B/P Bonus:
10%
Whistle:
Silver
Trophies:
4
Medals:
142
Supporter:
7y 4m 4d
Gear:
1