TaintedLogic's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[RetroMania - Main Theme]

I like the bright tone at the beginning and the crisp percussion. Some of the drum patterns seem a bit square and cheesy (with some overused tom rolls and crashes at times), though the classic rock organ and spacey pads give the piece a strong sense of atmosphere. The melodies at :52 are nice too, and the upbeat mood and sound design help me stay engaged. I think the piece could use a bit more structuring, though, as the energy level and most of the instrumental palette stay pretty constant throughout. There are also some abrupt transitions in places, like at 3:20. The ending came on a tad suddenly; I’d suggest either a full-volume flourish or a more gradual fade-out. That said, I really like the instrumentation, production quality, atmosphere, and harmonic content of this piece overall. Keep at it, Manvineo! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
8/10

Manvineo responds:

Thank you so much for the review, Tainted <3. I am so honored to be judged by a professional like you. Reading your review gave me the determination to hone my craft in composing so that by the next NGUAC, I might create a piece that you and the other future judges might find satisfactory.

[Rose Mirror - Lunziestella]

I like the eerie atmosphere at the beginning, but some of the tinny synths in the treble range sound a bit harsh in my headphones. You might consider taking some of the treble off of them, or at the very least softening the echo effects. The grating atmospheric details and dreamy harmonies blend quite nicely together here, and the drum patterns are quite creative too. The dissonance at :53 seems fitting too, and the modulations at 1:06 really doubles down on the experimental texture. I think at some point the composition needed a stronger sense of direction about it, though. There are a lot of creative ideas here that I would’ve liked to see you flesh out more, but - much like a ghost that can walk through walls - this piece doesn’t seem to know which room it wants to be in. I’m really torn about this piece overall. You’re getting top marks for originality, sound design, and atmosphere, but the mixing could be a tad more polished, and the composition seems a bit choppy and jarring at times. If you ever revisit this piece, though, send me a PM. It has a lot of potential. Keep at it, Lunziestella! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
7.75/10

[Bro I'm straight up having a good time]

At first, the fade-in at the beginning sounded somewhat ominous to me, but by :05 or so I’m fully invested in the blissful vibe of this piece. I wish the drums were a bit more prominent in the texture towards the beginning. That said, the sound design (including the quirky chopped vocals and bubbly VGM synths) is great, and the melodies are catchy and upbeat. In the second half of the piece, it would’ve been nice if you had added more variety to the vocal lines and melodies, but I appreciated the compositional details like the drum fill at 2:08 and the layering of the vocals over the melodies at 2:37. Overall, really fun piece, Ko0x! The sound design, mixing, rhythmic content, and melodies are all super enjoyable here. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
8.75/10

ko0x responds:

Thank you very much for this positive and detailed feedback :) <3

[Red Dwarf]

I like the ominous mood at the beginning along with the quirky percussion and rich atmosphere. There’s a good sense of build into :42, but the drop thereafter sounds a bit grating and minimal. I like the cinematic flair and spacey sound design (no pun intended), but the progression is pretty slow-paced, and I would’ve liked to hear some more memorable melodies and harmonic depth at some point. The echo-y piano seems like it’s the main “foregrounded” element of the piece for long stretches of time. I think you could’ve more effectively engaged the listener with some more dynamic riffs or phrases. The second half of this piece doesn’t add much in the way of novel content, either. You did an excellent job of establishing the mood and transitioning into an emotional height at the drops, but the composition still felt a tad underwhelming at the end of the day. That said, one element of the piece that’s truly impressive is the production quality - you balance the mid-range bass and screechy synths quite well at the drops, and the atmospheric instruments blend together quite well. Full credit for sound design and mixing here. The composition just felt like a bit of a missed opportunity, is all. Keep at it, JustTop! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
7.25/10

[Rise of Hope [NGUAC]]

I like the acoustic sound design and waltzy vibe at the beginning. The whimsical string lines at :32 and reverb-heavy atmosphere really contribute a lot to the texture, and you do a great job of giving the composition a dynamic feel. The mallets at 1:45 are especially nice - I wish they were a bit more prominent in the mix, actually. The upbeat mood and cutesy sound design really win me over here. If I had to criticize one thing, it might be that the progression feels a bit slow-paced at times, but in the context of the piece, that often helps to sell the emotional qualities here. Overall, the composition, sound design, production quality, and atmosphere are all great. Keep it up, Jotrocken! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9.25/10

Jotrocken responds:

Thanks TaintedLogic for sending me feedback after you finished judging phase. Glad you liked the dynamic feel, there is a lot of effort. Mallet could be more in focus at 1:45 right. Gonna start my Final now hope you all like it as much as you liked this one :)

Very happy with this result.

[Starting Anew]

I like the tranquil piano line at the beginning. The violin at :18 was also a good idea, and overall the texture sounds rich and full despite only containing two main instruments. The melodies at :45 are beautiful, and you’ve done a great job of giving the composition a strong sense of storytelling and dynamism despite its short length. The emotional appeal of sections like 1:20 is great. Towards the end, I think you overuse the stop-start transitions a tad, but overall I’m really impressed with the progression, harmonic content, production quality, and sound design here. Keep it up, Jesse! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9.25/10

JesseTikka responds:

Didn't even come think that a transition type could be overused, but good point. Thanks a lot!

[Ambar]

I like the tranquil mood at the beginning and the quirky pads. The crisp beats and strings at :14 were nice touches, too. The brighter tone at :50 is cool, and I like the sharper percussion at 1:02 as well. The piece is a bit slow to progress at times, and is kind of lacking in harmonic depth and melodic content. The bridge with the flashy string lines was a good idea, though, and I appreciate the variations on the breaks the second time around at 2:41. The arrangement here is a bit choppy, with a lot of stop-start transitions and sudden additions of instruments. It might be nice to find more ways of creating dynamism within the phrases - automation, variations on the main riffs, etc. I also thought the outro was a tad bland. The production quality here is really good - perhaps a bit over-compressed, but your volume levels are still under control. The sound design and mood of the piece are probably my favorite elements of it, but you also did a good job with the rhythmic content, mastering, and atmosphere. Keep at it, Jekoer! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
7.5/10

Jekoer responds:

I really appreciate that you took the time to give an opinion of my song.
Despite not being selected for the final round, I am happy to be considered for this and allow myself to create something for you.
Thanks a lot! I hope to see us next year.

[KO ROUND: Gyaru Death 2010]

I like the white noise at the beginning and the echo-y vocals. The eerie pads at :15 are nice too, and the drums have a really gritty and grating sound. The melancholy chords contrast nicely with the energy and drive of the drum patterns. I also like the brighter tone of the piece at around 1:15. The texture is a bit minimal at times - not a lot of action in the bass range. Layering on a sub-bass or even some low chords might’ve helped round things out better. Earlier on, the piece is missing some treble tones too. That said, the production quality is really strong, and I love the sound design later on with the dreamy upper-range phasing synths. Overall, the composition is a bit bland, though, with not a lot of memorable melodies or dynamism within the phrases. Still, I’m enjoying the atmosphere, mixing, rhythmic content, and progression here. Keep at it, JarJarZoinks! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
7.25/10

2keg responds:

thanks for the review Mr.Logic. Never had a track get a proper review so I appreciate a lot bruv :3

[uncertain directions]

I like the pensive mood at the beginning and the dissonance in the E-piano line at :18. The texture is full and well-balanced, but not mastered particularly loudly. The drums in particular might’ve benefitted from some more compression. I like the sense of climax into 1:13, and how that leads directly into the moody bridge. In the second half, I think I would’ve liked to see you do a little bit more with the composition, though. This piece has a lot of underlying tension that never really gets resolved, and the abrupt ending only compounds that fact. You nailed the mood, sound design, and progression here. My complaints are mostly with the mixing and compositional details. Still, strong effort overall, JA4Y! Really paints a picture of mice sneaking around a kitchen late at night to steal some cheese. :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
7.5/10

[Burning Jungle]

I like the cutesy riff at the beginning. The synth sounds a bit dry, though, and could probably use some reverb or other mixing effects to give it more of a sense of atmosphere. I’m enjoying the sense of build into :43, and the quirky percussion thereafter is refreshing and catchy. Some of the instruments in here are pretty generic, though, like the synth lead at 1:02, the mid-range bass at :13, and the snare at :17. The mixing and mastering are pretty good, although the piece is a tad over-compressed at times. I also think you could’ve fleshed out the composition a tad more here. I wanted to see some more depth in the harmonies, memorable melodic content, and thicker textures that give the piece a stronger sense of ebb and flow. That said, the rhythmic content, atmosphere, and production quality of this piece are all quite good. Keep at it, Ivki! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
6/10

enipoint responds:

Oh, ty (☆▽☆) (btw, I made it in fl studio mobile 3 :p)