TaintedLogic's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[Snikio - Checkmate]

I like the old-timey piano intro. You may have overdone the static in the background, but the tape speed-up at :10 was a nice touch, and the bouncy piano riff at :12 is really nice. I would’ve liked the walking bass to be a bit more prominent in the mix, but the descending melodic riff at :28 help keep me engaged. I love the pads that start fading in during that section, but the first minute of the piece still feels pretty top-heavy frequency-wise. Despite the minimalism at 1:01, you finally hit me with that bass, and it’s glorious! By then, though, the melodies feel a tad repetitive. The piano re-intro at 1:34 was a nice touch, and I’m really liking the brass melodic variations at 1:55. The more traditional build-up into 2:22 was also really neat. The eagle screech sound effect at 2:41 works well, although I would’ve liked to hear some more variety in the melodies during the second drop/chorus, and the transition back into the “old-timey” tape sound at 3:31 was a little rough. Overall, you’re definitely getting full credit for catchiness and melodic content, but the lack of variety is also hurting you a bit. Still, really admirable work on the production/sound design side, and the rhythmic content is a big plus here as well. Keep at it, Dowon! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
8.75/10

Snikio responds:

Thank you so much!!! It's happy to have this detailed review. I'm gonna edit and complete this track refer to your amazing fantastic super duper absolutely hyper great comment

[(OTG) Cirque Du Dismay - Intro]

I like the percussion at the beginning and the dramatic orchestral hits starting at :05. It’s a little hard to get a sense of the harmonic framework at first, but I like the dreamy texture at :27 and the string melodies shortly thereafter. I like the sense of climax into :53, and the mix is clean and well-balanced throughout. The organ hang-over from the held note at 1:16 threw me off a bit, but by 1:31 I’m enjoying the crisp string line, and the organ blends in nicely. The dissonance in the texture at 1:55 or so and the accelerando are all great compositional details. The ending felt a bit inconclusive, but it is an intro, after all. Overall, my biggest concerns here are probably with the choppy arrangement and meandering harmonic structure, especially the modulations at :53 or so. It’s very hard to follow the progression of the piece at times, despite the generous use of percussion fills and similar instrumentation between adjacent sections. Still, I really admire the variety of moods and textures you’ve crammed into a short 3 minutes, and the cinematic appeal of the piece is irresistible at times. You told a story for sure - I’m a little concerned that the story is disjointed and incomplete, but the narrative ebb and flow is self-evident here. Otherwise, excellent work with the sound design, production quality, melodies, and atmosphere. Keep it up, Codefreq! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
8.75/10

Codefreq responds:

Thank you very much for the detailed feedback! :) I'll definitely factor those notes into my creation of future pieces.

[Ambition]

I like the cute synths and bright pads at the beginning. The sidechaining on the kick at :21 is a bit heavy, and the chord progression is a bit cliche. I’m enjoying the melodies at 1:03, although their structure seems a bit formulaic. The sound design switch-up starting with the melodic variations at 1:45 was a good idea. I also like the 8-bit drums that come in shortly thereafter. I feel like you could’ve transitioned back into the main melody at 2:06 a bit smoother. It might’ve helped if you had implemented some of the new instruments from the bridge into the rest of the piece. Otherwise, the arrangement comes across as, again, a bit formulaic, and by the end the piece feels pretty repetitive. My other big problem with it is the lack of originality in the harmonic structure. That said, the production quality is solid and the rich atmosphere and decent sound design earn you back some points. Overall, teasing out the composition a bit more is my biggest list item for improvement, but the upbeat mood and cutesy melodies help keep me engaged. Thanks for coming out to the NGUAC this year, and congratulations on getting this far! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.25/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
7.5/10

[Can't Stop the Time]

I like the gritty texture at the beginning and the phasing effects. The bass at :24 is very heavy, but the dark mood and frantic drums help keep me engaged. The synths are all really cool, but the texture is a tad minimal and the progression is pretty slow-paced. The production quality is really solid, and the creative filtering work on the grouchy mid-range bass helps keep me engaged. The texture is actually pretty well-balanced, with a decent amount of harmonizing across the frequency range, but overall the soundscape is still pretty thin throughout. By the end, this piece is rather repetitive. Perhaps some more variety in the energy level and harmonic framework would help take the composition of this piece to the next level. Until then, I really admire your drum instruments and synths, atmosphere, use of mixing effects, and mastering abilities. Keep at it, BasiatordeCoronatus! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
7.75/10

[Agente.001 - Spectral Artillery (NGUAC v.)]

I like the glitchy intro and the prominent sub-bass. The rich atmosphere by :17 or so is also really nice. It’s a tad difficult to follow the rhythmic content until the beat comes in at :20, but I’m enjoying the sound design and the more melodic flair at :40 or so. The mix is very clean, if a tad over-compressed. The build-up to the drop at 1:15 was really well-done, and the drop itself had a healthy amount of variety to maintain interest, even if it was a tad long. The atmospheric breakdown at 2:03 was really nice - I love the filtering work at 2:13 and the heavy reverb at 2:20. I honestly think you could’ve ended the piece at the 3-minute mark, but the second drop was a pleasant surprise, and I appreciated that there was more harmonic content during the drop the second time around. The outro with the detuned sitar was also a good idea. Overall, I’m exactly one submission into the judging for this round, but this is going to be tough to beat. Really strong work with the atmosphere, instrumentation, and progression. The mix feels a tad overwhelmed at times, but in the grand scheme of things that’s only a minor problem for me. Keep up the good work, Agente001Tomhson! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9.25/10

[Cotton Swab]

I like the groovy bass riff at the beginning and the crisp drums. The pads at :12 are pretty quirky and fun, but also might take up a tad too much space in the mix relative to the rhythm section. Overall, the sound design here is really fun, and I’m digging the cutesy melodies starting at :38. That said, the texture is pretty minimal throughout, and the climactic section at 1:17 could’ve used a smoother and/or more gradual transition. The arrangement of the piece feels a bit formulaic and rushed, although the production quality holds up well and the sound design is probably my favorite element of the piece. A little more effort on structuring and flow could go a long way towards making this an 8-range track for me. Until then, nice job with the ghostly melodies, instrumentation, and mixing. :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
7.25/10

[Cykamen]

I like the catchy synth riffs at the beginning. The instruments themselves are a bit cheesy, and also sound a bit overly contained in the mix at times. The drop at 1:10 was a little minimal and repetitive, and the screechy synth that plays every beat at 1:24 was a bit much. Otherwise, that sound design in this piece is pretty unique, although in places the composition falls flat. The main chord progression is pretty cliche, and the piece is lacking melodic content throughout. The production quality is pretty well-balanced and clean, but could also use a few more effects to fill out the texture. Overall, this is a catchy and fun piece that could use a bit more harmonic depth and creativity in some of the compositional elements (I’m especially thinking of the long sections that have 3-note bass lines and a series of effects, but little else going on - see 3:12-3:35). Not to be overly harsh, though. It is going to be stuck in my head for a while. Keep at it, Walpang! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
7/10