TaintedLogic's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[Odyssey]

I like the ominous mood at the beginning and the sound design. The percussion at :20 is nice, but could sound a bit sharper in the mix. The strings in the background there also sound a tad indistinct. I wonder if it would help to cut back on the reverb and get stricter with the frequencies you cut out of some of the instruments with equalizers. Still, the mood here is really captivating - I especially like the atmosphere at 1:16. I was itching to hear some of the tension in this piece resolved with some more prominent melodic content, so I enjoyed the woodwind solo at 2:05, although I wish it was a little more front-and-center in the mix for full dramatic impact. I love how much the breakdown section at 2:20 features that frantic percussion. I can just picture the dudes playing it, hands flying by in a whir. The quirky solos at 2:52 were great, and they flow nicely into the horn melodies at 3:24 as well. There’s also some really cool plucking going on in the strings there. The emotional appeal of the outro was great, by the way, and the creepy details there (like the pulsing synth at 4:17 and the bass slides) were very well-done.

Obviously, the composition and sound design here are both excellent. My main concern is the mixing - right now, it’s pretty loud and well-balanced, but not always clean enough to highlight all of the fun nuances of this track. Again, I’d get very choosy about how much reverb you use and what instruments you use it on. Try experimenting more with automating the amount of reverb on a given instrument over time. You could also make more generous use of filters and panning in this piece to really keep instruments that have the same frequency ranges isolated in the mix. Still, overall you knocked this one out of the park. Really fun solos, compositional details, sound design, atmosphere, and mood. Keep it up, UndervaniaMusic! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
9.25/10

uvimusic responds:

Yo! This is absolutely surreal having the 'Anthony Fantano' of Newgrounds not only give my track a review, but give my track a great review! Seriously, whenever I look at someone else that got a good review from you, I have always wondered if one day I would be able to get to their level of skill to be able to secure a similar review. I'm more than happy that I managed to please you and I'll shoot for better next round. Have a great day! (And yes I have taken your suggestions, thanks a ton for them :)

[Breathe]

I like the grouchy bass at the beginning. It was a little bizarre when the bass suddenly ended at :34, but the atmosphere thereafter is really cool, and I love the dark radio effects. The pace of progression is pretty slow, but the experimental texture definitely helps keep me engaged. The production quality is strong, and I love the cool drum fills at 1:28 and other places. I think you could’ve made better use of the treble range of the frequency spectrum here, especially during the first couple of minutes, and the minimal texture wears on me after a while, particularly when contrasted to the engrossing intro. The sound design and atmosphere remain cool throughout, but I would’ve liked to see a little more harmonic depth or melodic development at some point. I liked it when you stripped away the drums and brought back that pulsing bass riff at the breakdown at 4:00. The lead-in to the more energetic section at 5:14 also worked well, especially given the relative calm section at 5:00 or so after a litany of bass-heavy effects. :) I still think you needed a more powerful statement to hit this piece home towards the end, but overall the sound design, atmosphere, and mixing helped carry this one. Keep at it, Ultimatepalmtree3! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
7.5/10

[Etheral]

I like the sound design at the beginning. Very quirky atmosphere here, though - it takes a while to get used to, especially the rhythmic elements. That pulsing synth chord towards the beginning feels like it’s not really helping the listener stay grounded. I like the burst of intensity at :45, but the drums sound a tad indistinct and it’s still a little hard to process what’s going on in the synth patterns - both harmonically and rhythmically. The transition at 1:30 is a little sudden, and the second half of the piece is pretty repetitive. Honestly, the combination of the abrupt transitions, often minimal texture, and wonky meter don’t work super well for me. There also isn’t much of a sense of direction to the piece over time, and the abrupt ending is a testament to that. The strongest element of the piece is the production quality in my mind, even if the mix is a little quiet, and the sound design is also pretty cool. The composition is just a little too experimental for me. Sorry. I can tell you’re a talented producer, though, and the rich atmosphere and creative drum fills were both really nice. Keep at it, Troike! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
.75/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.25/1
Composite score
5.5/10

[Mystery Night In The City]

I like the rhythmic content at the beginning and the cutesy sound design. The bass line kinda reminds me of Oye Como Va. The melodic content is nice, but sometimes there’s a little dissonance in the texture between the bass line, the pads with the chromatic descending pattern, and melodies. This piece could also use more structural variety, as it has the same harmonic framework, instrumental hierarchy, and to a large extent energy level for the entire piece. I also thought the ending could’ve been a little more creative than a fade-out. Still, the sound design, mood, mixing, and melodies are strong here. The piece could just use a little more structuring, in addition to some clarity in the harmonic framework. Overall, it’s a groovy piece with a fun, mysterious mood. Keep at it, TimeTravelleR54! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
7.75/10

TimeTravelleR54 responds:

Very thanks for the honestly feedback. I will consider all of this for the near future :)

[Asteroid]

I like the atmosphere at the beginning. The piano is a little dry and generic, and I’m also not a huge fan of the clap at :16. There’s a good sense of climax into :30, although the mix sounds a bit strained there. I like the build-up into 1:15. There’s a bit of dissonance in the texture at 1:15 in the low-mid range, but I’m having trouble determining exactly which instrument it is. Bit of a bizarre choice to pan the open hat at 2:00 to the right - usually drums should be front-and-center in the mix, except as a transitional or momentary thing. I’m really enjoying the melodies at around 3:00, though. There’s a little more dissonance in the texture at 3:35 between the main melodies and the pads in the background. I might’ve liked to see more variation on the main melody towards the end, and also a proper outro, but overall this piece comes together well compositionally. My main concern remains the mixing - try getting stricter with how you use equalizers, filtering, and the like. Instead of panning the drums, try using stereo widening on the pads. It might also help to cut back on the reverb in places and filter out more of the lower-pitched tones in the pads and melodies. That said, the compositional elements of the piece are really strong, and I like the blissful mood and rich atmosphere of this one. Keep at it, TheTMusic! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
7.25/10

TheTmusic responds:

Thank you for your feedback, I will try to keep it in mind while working on new songs

[Anthropomorphia (Crackerjack's Theme)]

I like the rich texture at the beginning and the quirky percussion at around :10. Some of the synths are a bit cheesy and generic, especially the pads, but I’m enjoying the melodies at :12, and the production quality is also pretty good. I was itching for a little more structural variety by around 1:30, so I enjoyed the groovy new pads at 1:45 and the subsequent modulation at 2:13. The piece still has a pretty consistent energy and dynamics level throughout, though, so it would be nice to see a bridge or breakdown at some point to give the composition a little more shape. Overall, my main concerns with this piece are the cliche synths and lack of variety, and also the mix could be a tad sharper in places if you cut back on the reverb. Still, I enjoyed the melodies, rhythmic content, and progression of this one. Keep at it, TheSentiment! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
7.75/10

[Police State, Signed CDC]

I like the tranquil atmosphere at the beginning. The texture sounds a tad indistinct, though, and I wonder if it would help if the bass and the lead had more space between them (in terms of pitch, that is). Still, I like the moody vocals at :35 and the burst of intensity at 1:05. It sounds like the crashes there are getting either cut off or distorted somehow, however. The vocals at 1:38 are really well-done, and the return of the moody vocal riff at 2:15 alongside the distorted guitar is a really nice touch. I really like the melodies at 2:45 and the “aftershocks” at 3:15 after the rest of the instrumentals divert to a solemn plucking. The outro was especially captivating, and it also fits the thematic content well - literally sounds like defeat. Overall, I think the production is a tad rough around the edges, but you won me over with the soulful vocals and powerful guitar melodies. Full credit for sound design, structure/transitions, and emotional/atmosphere. Keep it up, TRF! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
8.75/10

TheRealFool responds:

Thank you for the detailed review! I certainly would've done some things about the mix differently, but the file's corrupted so this'll do for now. Glad to hear you appreciated the composition and performances!

[Enchanted (2020 Version)]

I like the blissful mood and the sound design at the beginning. The sudden drop in volume levels in the strings at :27 was a nice touch. I was a little thrown off, however, when the piano and strings tag-teamed it at :41. I guess I found it jarring that the piano didn’t also continue on as part of the texture. Still, that’s a pretty small detail. I like the cutesy instrument at :46 and the burst of energy at :55. The piece comes together well by the end. I wasn’t a huge fan of the thin, inauthentic-sounding snare at 1:09 - it just didn’t vibe well with the character of the piece. Overall, I really like the composition here, from the melodies to the progression to the rhythmic elements, and the production quality is good too. Most of my complaints here are nit-picks. Keep it up, TahtuhChips! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
8.75/10

ArramEggleston responds:

I completely agree with the piano and the snare. Thanks for the review! :)

[Tony Igy & Vicetone - Astronomia (kallashi! Remix)]

I like the calming mood at the beginning and the sound design. The drums at :23 are really creative, even while the chord progression is pretty cliche. The texture sounds a tad distorted at :40 in the bass range - it might be that the spacing of the chords on those low pads could be wider to give the texture a richer, more open feel. The harmonic content is a little repetitive later in the piece, and the section at 1:33 has the same problem as :40. That said, the production quality is strong here, and the saxophone at 1:56 was a nice touch. Overall, this piece might need a bit more harmonic variety and structuring, but the sound design, atmosphere, and mixing are all strong. Keep at it, Sunglasses909! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
7.25/10

Sunglasses909 responds:

Thank you so much! =D

[Chilling Spot]

I like the energy at the beginning and the bouncy synth melodies at :07. The chord progression is a little cliche, but the rich, bass-heavy texture helps keep things interesting, and the strong melodic content continues in the post-chorus at :42. After a time, the piece might’ve needed a tad more variety in the harmonic framework and instrumental hierarchy, though. Otherwise, it risks bouncing around between a bunch of cool melodies without ever really leading anywhere as an overarching narrative. There were also times when I wanted the drums to be a little more prominent in the mix, and the ending could’ve been a little more creative than a fade-out. Still, I’m really enjoying the rich texture, sound design, and melodies here. Keep at it, Stouf7908! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
8.25/10

stouf7908 responds:

Thanks !!