TaintedLogic's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[THRASHOR]

I like the creepy mood at the beginning and the glass-breaking sound effect. The filtering is nice, but the drums sound a little dry and the gritty guitar synth sounds a little muddy. The bass at :25 is a little too loud, and overall the texture here is pretty minimal and doesn’t have a strong sense of progression. I like the sense of climax into 1:03, but you didn’t really add much harmonic content during the drop, just drums and a little decoration to the bass line. The production quality here is pretty good, but I think you needed a little more depth to the composition. Some more variation and melodic content would be especially nice. The second half of the piece adds very little novel content, and despite the catchy riffs and crisp drums, I’m not sure you did enough to keep me engaged for the duration of the piece. Overall, the rhythmic elements of this piece are really cool and I like the mood and production. But the composition is pretty underwhelming, and a lot of the arrangement, progression, and sound design of the piece seems pretty unoriginal. Keep at it, SunnySideUpMusic! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.25/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.25/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
5.5/10

[Combustion]

I like the groovy bass at the beginning, and the guitar riff at :07 was cool, but the instrument itself sounded really harsh in the mix. The heavy drums help keep up the intensity, but I think you overdid the reverb on the snare. The progression is pretty good, and the rhythmic content is fun, but I think the distorted mix detracts from my enjoyment of the piece. The heavy pads at 1:06 are a valuable addition to the texture, and the mid-range bass during the bridge at 2:05 also sounds really cool. That said, the drums and guitars are struggling to come through the mix because of the heavy bass, and despite the fun industrial vibe of the piece, it could use a little more atmosphere. I’d start by trying to incorporate some more consistent mid-high tones into the texture, and also running some of the bass-heavy instruments through a high-pass filter. I also think the compositional elements of the piece seem a bit pasted-together. I’d like to see you use more advance techniques for creating variety - like phrasing, dynamics, automation, etc. - instead of just adding and subtracting instruments over time. Overall, the sound design here is awesome, and you nailed the mood and emotional quality of the guitars as well. That said, the production could be a lot cleaner, and I was looking for a stronger sense of ebb and flow in the arrangement. Keep at it, StoneForged! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
7.5/10

[Logic]

The sweep at the beginning was cool, although I think you dragged out the intro a bit. The thin claps in the texture for the first 15 seconds or so seem like filler. Still, the texture of the piece falls together really quickly after that, and I like the 80s-style dance chords, crisp drums, and back-up harmonies at :27. The melody synth at :41 is a bit cheesy, and I also would’ve liked to see a stronger sense of build into the melodic section. After you repeat the structural pattern of the first minute or so again, I’m beginning to lose an overarching sense of direction for this piece. The pensive background synths at 2:20 are nice, but other than that there’s very little novel content in this piece after the first minute, which I think is a huge mistake. Your instrumental palette is pleasant, and you clearly have a good sense of harmony and rhythm, but the sweeps are overused, the harmonies extremely repetitive, and the melodic content lacking by the end of the piece. I think you needed some more harmonic depth, including melodic content that could help hit this piece home. At the very least, I would’ve varied the melody at 3:52 a little more. Until then, the composition is pretty bland. That said, you’re clearly a talented producer. I really like the crisp hi-hats and well-balanced frequencies here. Keep at it, SpockMusic! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.25/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
6.75/10

[Back To You]

I like the dreamy arpeggios at the beginning and the bright mood. The pads at :12 sound pretty relaxing, but around this time it becomes apparent that there’s some distortion in the mix. I think you need to remove any limiters and/or compressors you have on the master channel, and also do some more careful equalization work. Toning down the reverb might also help add some clarity to the mix, but the filtering should probably be a priority. You don’t want more than 1-2 instruments playing at a time if they have a lot of bass overtones in them. That said, the composition is pretty nice and the progression is pleasant. There’s a good sense of build-up starting at 1:02, and the drop at 1:29 was well-balanced and full-textured, even if I was craving some more dynamic melodic content by this point. I think a lot of your synths and chord progressions sound pretty generic, though. The structure of the piece is good overall, and I like the re-intro at 2:23 and subsequent build-up at 2:46. I think this track needed some more variety later in the piece, though. Despite the full texture and strong atmosphere, there isn’t a lot of harmonic development or prominent melodic content here. The lead synth at the drops has a really simple contour, and only really serves to outline the chordal patterns. Overall, I like the mood, relaxing instruments, and structuring here, but I think the production quality, variety, and compositional details need some more work. Keep at it, Sp3edometer! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.25/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
5.5/10

[SoFtBOILeD-By Your Side]

The synths at the beginning are cute, but I think the lead synth there is a little harsh-sounding. I think you could stand to dial back the reverb a bit and take another look at the equalizer for the synths. They might have a bit too much treble. While I like the texture overall here, it seems like the rhythm of the beat, especially after around :44, is a little too busy when paired with the synths. The rhythmic content is just a bit too dense overall. The piece also doesn’t really have a strong sense of progression until around the 1-minute mark, but I like the filtering work on the lead synth at 1:06. I think that watery version of the synth is actually a lot more pleasant to listen to than the staccato-y patterns earlier. The percussion solo at 1:18 is a bit overdone, and after the build-up into 1:50, the harmonic content and instrumentation of the piece seems rather different, which is a bit jarring. I’m starting to think that you need to consolidate some of your compositional ideas in this piece and focus on 2-3 main ideas, with more emphasis on creating variety with phrasing, automation, and the like instead of adding and subtracting a lot of instruments all the time. That said, the glitchy percussion and bright synths at 1:50 sound really cool in isolation, and I would’ve liked to see you do more to develop those themes rather than reset the piece again at 2:35. The part at 2:47 sounded like a pretty pleasant breakdown, even though the texture was pretty thin. It also dragged on for a bit too long imo, and at 3:30 it seems like you’re taking the piece in yet another unexpected direction. All of a sudden, it’s very atmospheric, yet the lead synths are very repetitive and the transition at 4:02 seems a little generic. Overall, there are a lot of good ideas here, but I think you need to make the arrangement less choppy with some more gradual transitions and connectivity in the harmonic content across sections. Mixing-wise, the piece is pretty solid, but I think you need some tighter equalization on some of the harsher-sounding instruments, and the drums aren’t quite punchy enough at some of the busier sections. Overall, I like the atmosphere, harmonic content, drums, and mood, but the texture can be a little too thin, the transitions need to be smoother and more gradual, and the composition can be choppy and repetitive. There’s a lot of potential here, though. I’d encourage you to keep working on this piece. Keep at it, SoFtBOILeD! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
5.75/10

[Final Boss Theme]

The fade-in at the beginning is pretty nice. There are generally more creative ways of introducing a piece, but here it’s pretty effective with the somewhat ominous mood. The sound design could be better, though. Your synths sound really simple, unpolished, and cheesy, despite the relatively good drum samples. The texture is also pretty thin, despite some good harmonic ideas like the chord progression at 1:03. The piece is catchy and has some cool rhythmic content, but there isn’t always a very strong sense of direction. The transition at 1:35 is pretty sudden, and otherwise the composition is pretty repetitive. Sometimes, the texture can also sound pretty atonal, like around 2:12. The strings at 2:23 were a good idea that help heighten the ominous mood, but you may have overdone it a bit with the clashing chords at 2:32. I think the composition here needs a little more shape and contrast in general. I wanted to see you strip away the drums and bass at some point and launch into a more melodic bridge or breakdown section. Mixing-wise, the piece sounds a bit strained during some of the busier sections (like 2:32), and overall the mix is pretty quiet. Some more compression and careful equalizing might help you out there. It also might help from a variety standpoint to switch up the drum beat more at some point. I liked the string solo at 3:43, though. There are definitely some good compositional ideas here, but the slow pacing and somewhat flat arrangement of the piece doesn’t help you get the most emotional impact out of your ideas. Overall, I like the atmosphere, rhythmic content, and mood, but I think some more effort is needed on the broader compositional concerns, instrumentation, and tonality. Keep at it, SleyGD! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
5.5/10

[SoftMatrix]

I like the quirky sound design and rhythmic content. You have a good sense of harmony and progression, too. That said, there’s a bit too much reverb in the texture for my tastes, and the chord progression here is pretty generic. I like the atmosphere of the piece, but the composition gets pretty repetitive after a while. The kick drum sounds pretty indistinct at 1:24, likely because of the excessive reverb, and despite the creative drumwork there isn’t a strong sense of harmonic progression in this piece. I wanted to hear some more prominent melodic content and development, but instead the composition came across as a little bland overall. There’s not much structuring in the piece, and you could use some more harmonic depth at times too. Overall, strong sense of atmosphere, sound design, and progression, but the mix is a little too watery and I wanted to hear some more compositional risks here. Keep at it, Sicarius771! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
7/10

[Hot Salsa]

I like the energy and bouncy vibe at the beginning, but the rhythm is a little hard-to-follow. There’s a good sense of build into :30, and the drop is pretty fun. The harsh synths at :31 needed a bit of reining in with an equalizer, though. That said, the rhythmic content has improved, and the piece is rather catchy and fun. The melody at 1:03 once again doesn’t seem well-synced with the beat, although I like the vocal samples and flavor of the piece (no pun intended) overall. The more atmospheric section at 1:32 was also a nice touch, and helped add some structural contrast in a typically very energetic track. I think the strongest element of the track is probably the production quality. I can hear all the instruments clearly throughout, although nothing seems over-compressed or particularly harsh, besides the high-pitched synth during the drop. I wish you had varied the drop a little more the second time around, although I’m more worried about the pretty generic arrangement and transitions of the piece. You could’ve done more to fill in the texture here, and the way you structured the cycle of build-ups and drops seems like it’s been done a million times before. That said, I enjoyed the thematic content of the piece, and the sound design and atmosphere here are fun. Overall, solid work, ShuffleHorse! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
7.5/10

[Coreizon]

I like the piano riffs at the beginning, but the texture sounds a little dry and harsh. There might be a bit too much compression on some of those piano samples and harmonies, and not enough reverb/delay/other mixing effects. That said, I like the rhythmic content and the progression by around :20. There’s a good sense of melody and direction to the piece, although the harsh texture at :36 was a little too much for me. The gritty effects completely drown out the harmonies, making for an over-saturated and unpleasant texture. It’s also very bottom-heavy in terms of frequencies. I think you need to rein in your volume levels and minimize the distortion in the mix here. It sounds like there are some cool riffs at 2:12, but once again they’re completely overwhelmed by the punchy, distorted mid-range bass. The result is that most of the piece has a very unpleasant sound design and little sense of progression or dynamism. I’d suggest consolidating some of your compositional ideas in a way that eliminates the distortion in the texture. Be careful not to over-compress your piece, and try to use an instrumental palette and mixing techniques that emphasize blending and balance over loudness. The first 30 seconds and last 45 of the piece sound good overall, but the brick-wall limiting and harsh sound design of the bulk of this piece are way overdone. I can tell you’re a talented composer, but the production and instrumentation seriously detract from my enjoyment of this piece. Keep at it, SheerForce! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.25/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.25/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.25/1
Composite score
2.5/10

[Time Paradox]

I like the peaceful mood at the beginning, even if the string samples sound a bit inauthentic given the uniform vibrato and such. I like the addition of the bass at :27; it really helps fill out the texture. There’s a good sense of build starting at :51, too. The drum samples, especially the snare, are a little generic, and the piece is pretty over-compressed. The climax at 1:18 sounds really full and rich, but not quite as energetic as I was anticipating given the build-up. The mid-range bass at 1:42 is a nice touch, and I like the emotional appeal of the strings here overall. The breakdown at 2:08 is nice, and the piano arpeggios in the background add a somber tone to the string drone. The build-up at 2:33 sounds very similar to the other one, and I think the punchy pads at 2:59 clash a bit with the overall relaxed vibe of the strings. I think the string melodies are also due for a little more variety towards the end of this piece. The emotional appeal of the outro was a nice touch, although I think the transition into it was pretty abrupt. Overall, I think the composition and atmosphere are really strong, but there’s room for a little more balance and blending in the mix and originality in the arrangement and progression. Keep at it, Serfab! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
7.75/10

Serfab responds:

Well thanks for the support.
I make it the most melodical as possible, i am more inclinated more to the chillstep or ambient music than Melodic Dubstep.
The sounds are pretty simples, making unique music in mobile is so hard and i need to experiment with it to found my own style,
Normaly It takes a lot of time.
Anyways, thanks for your support and for tell me what i should to be better:)