TaintedLogic's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[blue, like the sky]

Curious little percussion riffs at the beginning. The fade-in at :10 and the cute, jazzy pads at :12 are really nice. I love how the tonic chord doesn't quite strike on the downbeat at :24. The progression is a bit slow here, but the melodies at :45 and beyond were really nice. Piece has a vaguely wistful vibe about it. The minimalistic break at 1:09 with the videogame sound effects was a bit cheesy, but definitely showed off your good sense of rhythm. Occasionally, the piece can sound a bit harsh in the upper register, like with that synth at 2:01. Part of it may also be the panning - wideness can make an instrument sound harsher than it otherwise would be. That said, the production is quite enjoyable in almost every other regard. Spacious mix with well-balanced frequencies and a good amount of loudness. My main problem with the piece, however, is that it's a bit repetitive harmonically. You clearly spent a long time on the details here, which I appreciate, but I'm not quite getting an overarching sense of direction like I want to, and I think the sudden ending attests to that. Overall, really fun piece, though. Sound design and mood are fantastic here. Keep it up!

icantpronouncethis responds:

Thank you for your critique. This has been something different than I'm used to, but the direction I would love to get in to. When you meant by harsh, I'm guessing you mean that it cuts to through the mix too strong. I was trying to put that part more far behind like a after thought feel. But I had difficulty executing that. Tried adding wet only reverb, and just turning down the mix, but couldnt get the sound I needed. What would you suggest to push it back more?

[Incertae (cut)]

I like the somewhat melancholic mood at the beginning. The string sample at :13 wasn’t my favorite; sounds like it cut off a tad too early each time, and that the delay built into the sample was a tad too long. I like the sense of climax into :55, though. The harmonic content is a bit repetitive, and the build-up starting at 1:20 was a refreshing sense of directionality in the texture. I like the drop itself, too, as well as some of the more synthetic elements of the texture that come in at around 1:50. That said, given how repetitive this piece is I’m not sure it needed to be 5.5 minutes long. The frantic string arpeggios at 2:58 serves as a fun B-section, too. The mixing and mastering is very well done: loud, clean, and clear without being overly compressed. The filtering at 3:53 made that transition feel a bit sudden, but otherwise this piece is quite smooth-flowing too. I also appreciated the harder-hitting elements of the second drop. It was an effective way of creating variety, even if they hijack the mix a bit. The arrangement and sound design of the piece can come across as a bit generic, though. All the same, the piece comes together pretty well by the end. I think my main concerns are the repetition and a couple of small compositional details. Keep up the good work, Vidu3k333!

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.25/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
8.25/10

[Mastin - Hinterland (Original Mix)]

Lovely piano line at the beginning. The nature sFX is a nice touch too. The grouchy bass and busy (if somewhat contained) beat at :24 fit into the texture quite nicely. The progression is a bit slow, and I think the piece could use a bit more shape in general. The transition at 1:08 works pretty well, although I think the snare there sounds a bit thin and dry. I also wanted to see a little more harmonic variety in the piece. Seems like there are some pops and crackles from the nature FX or something at around 2:07 - it would be great if you could find a way of eliminating those. The mixing here is pretty good, although some more mastering effects could come in handy for you here. Luscious pads at 3:05 are gorgeous, but otherwise I feel as though this track could use a wetter atmosphere. You also might want to watch out for some of your volume levels; the major climactic parts of this track are approaching brick wall status. That said, I really like what you’ve done with some of the more downtempo parts of this track. Sound design and progression are good too, despite the slow pace. Keep at it, TimerClock14!

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
8/10

TimerClock14 responds:

Big love for the feedback sir! I'll keep these things in mind in my future works! Huge props by the way for organizing the entire NGAUC and judging not only 1 but 2 sections of the KO round. You're an absolute madman, tons of love my dude.

[The Spectre of the Marionette]

I like the waltz-style instrumentation and time signature. Melodies at :05 are beautiful, and the build-up into :27 is great. The piano flourish at :38 is great, and the victorious, blissful mood here really sells this piece well. I also appreciate the structural contrast at 1:03. I thought you overused the crashes a bit at around 1:20, and also that the brass sample at 1:56 sounds pretty inauthentic. That said, the sound design here is fantastic otherwise. I also would’ve liked to see you vary the main melodies a bit the second time around, but I don’t have any other complaints with the arrangement or structure either. Very strong work, overall. The production is quite good, too - well-balanced, clear, full, and loud. Not much to complain about here at all, Tennon. Keep up the great work!

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9.5/10

Tennon responds:

Wow, thanks for the review! I was waiting for you to mention the piano at :38 lol!

[Torque]

Woah. Funky beats at the beginning. I like the quirky sound design and the drama. Sounds like a postmodern movie soundtrack. There isn’t much of a proper intro here, but that decision reflects the thematic content pretty well. The experimental texture is actually really cool. Some of the high-pitched percussion at :41 sounds a little harsh in my ears, though. The texture from around :41 to 1:37 could use a bit of thickening. There’s a lot of minimalism, and I think you missed a big opportunity to capitalize on the funky sound design and ominous mood to really blow the listener away. Right now, there’s a lot of suspense in this piece without much cathartic content to hit it home. The swells at 2:02 sound absolutely amazing, though. You get full credit for instrumentation, atmosphere, and originality. The production quality is also really good, despite my complaints with the harsh percussion. My main concern is the lack of fill for most of the piece. I think it would help to have some more melodic content, bump up the volume on those bass frequencies during the emptier sections as you’re able, and also implement some more legato/drone-like content to keep up the flow. Otherwise, sweet piece. Thanks for the nightmares! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
7.75/10

[Vengeance Fighter]

I like the sound design from the get-go. The piece might need more of a proper intro, though. As it is now, it kinda throws the listener right into the action. I also think you could’ve used more phrasing in this piece. The first 30 seconds or so doesn’t have a very good sense of build-up. The refrain at :34 is fun, but I think you tried to do a bit too much with it in a sense. The texture felt very busy, and the progression of the melody a bit haphazard. The post-chorus at 1:01 was a nice additional structurally, but I think the drums could’ve come forward in the mix a bit more to make that section feel more punchy. In general, the mix here is pretty loud and well-balanced, but also a little dry. Some more reverb would give this piece a more full-sounding texture too, but be careful not to overuse it. The clarity of the mix is more important than having lots of reverb. The outro bit at 2:21 was fun, although I wish you had changed up the second refrain a bit more so that it didn’t mirror the first one as closely. Overall, cute piece. Keep at it, NGBaronAwesomeness!

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
7/10

NGBaronAwesomeness responds:

Thanks for the review dude! Although I didn't get into the KO round I still beat my friend @OfficialHenyx (who is, by the way, generally better than me at everything) by making a song in a genre that I've never even tried before.
I understand how in the beginning of the song it was a little one-dimensional, and that's mainly because I intended to make the transition between the intro and the next part more suspenseful.
Also, I agree that the mix was kinda bad. The software I used to create this song didn't have a very good mixer/master, and even if it did, it wouldn't have been very user friendly.
But with all that out of the way, thanks for making a full-on review of my song, I greatly appreciate it.

(P.S. I can't afford supporter rank so I have to go with "NGBaronAwesomeness" thanks to myself 3 years ago. It's Prospect if you were even wondering 😝)

[Miston Music - Warm Mood]

I like the thin, pizzicato-y synth sound at the beginning and the subtle build-up into :15. There are a lot of short, staccato elements to the texture; I think you may have needed a stronger pad or something in there to fill out the texture. When the harmonies dropped out at :47, it was a bit jarring, but I enjoyed the refrain at 1:03. Melodies are cute. The mix is also really loud and clear here, although sometimes I think the drums get a little distorted (1:22, for instance). The breakdown section at 1:37 was nice. The pacing of this piece is really fast, though. There are a lot of distinct sections squeezed into a short amount of time, and that can come across as disorienting as a listener. Also, I’d encourage you to double-check how harsh the upper-register frequencies in this piece sound, especially at 2:57 or so, for example. Otherwise, the arrangement of this piece is really nice, and it feels conclusive by the end. Aspects of the harmonic progression were a bit cliche, but overall the piece feels engaging and fun. Keep at it, Miston!

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
8.5/10

Miston responds:

I’m glad you liked it. ;)

[Welcome To The Accelerated World]

I like the guitar riffs at the beginning. The piece could use more of a proper intro, but it’s got some great energy from the get-go. The sense of progression isn’t always so strong, other than the high-pitched riffs around the 1-minute mark. The production quality is good; I can hear everything clearly throughout. I would’ve liked to see you offer the listener some more structural variety at some point. The piece has a near-uniform intensity that makes it hard to stay engaged after a while. The composition needs more ebb and flow, and when the structure does change it’s really sudden, like at 2:01. In fact, 2:01 was probably my favorite part of the piece. Really fun melodies there, and the piece comes together pretty well by the end. Keep at it, Meatboot!

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
8/10