TaintedLogic's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[Outcast]

The intro, while a simple fade-in concept, was effective. I like the cute synths and the sweeps. The build-up beginning at :33 was a nice touch, and I enjoyed the refrain. I think there’s more room for stronger melodic content. I don’t really consider arpeggios melodic content. While the mix is really loud, it sounds both over-compressed and a tad indistinct at times. I’d suggest trying to rely more on equalizing than compression to make your mastering sound clear and well-balanced. I think the other main flaw with this piece is that there’s not a lot of variety between the first and second half. The two refrains sound very similar, and the underlying harmonic framework of the piece never really changes. That said, the ritardando at the end was a good idea. I think your composition skills are pretty strong overall, and it’s great that your mix, while not perfect, sounds so loud and full. Other than that, the instrumentation and arrangement of the piece are a tad generic. Overall, solid work with the build-ups, atmosphere, and volume levels. Keep at it, NoobGameYT!

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
7.75/10

NoobGameYT responds:

Thank you so much, it was really fun and I can't wait to join the N G U A C next time :)

[Arcade]

I like the cute synth at the beginning. Nice job with the portamentos too. The rhythm by around :17 sounds a bit experimental, but the climax into :48 is nice. Unfortunately, the drums get seriously lost in the mix at that point, and the bass is too loud. I think you need to be a little stricter with the equalizer, and maybe compress the drums more. The mix is sufficiently loud, but it’s not very well-balanced in my opinion. The drums could also use some more reverb, and the clap sounds pretty generic. The song is well-structured and smooth-flowing, though, and at the end of the day I like the quirky instrumentation and somewhat unconventional rhythmic choices you made. Keep at it, MishkoLalko!

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
7.75/10

[Fight for the truth]

I like the airy piano at the beginning and the majestic string swells. Pacing of the piece is really good. Slow, but with interesting rhythmic components that create an engaging syncopated element to the texture. The string samples don’t sound particularly authentic, but the high level of emotion by around :50 was nice. I almost wanted the pause at 1:06 to last longer. Nice sense of suspense and foreboding throughout this piece. The flute/piccolo at 1:43 or so is a great touch, too. Occasionally, the transitions in this piece could’ve been smoother, notably at 1:51. The warm sound of the strings at 2:15 was great, and the re-intro at 2:25 helped provide a solid base for the final climax of the piece. The harmonic shift at 2:59 was a great addition to the texture, too. I especially liked the punchy strings at 3:12 in the lead-up to 3:35. The descending line at 3:57 leaves the foreboding element of the mood unresolved at the end, a risky yet tasteful choice. Production quality is great, too. Loud, clear mix throughout. My main complaints are limited to some minor concerns about the instrumentation and a couple of less-than-smooth transitions. Keep up the great work, Lukiaffe!

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9/10

[Used to Be]

Majestic riff at the beginning. Sounds a bit thin, but once the rest of the texture fills in it’s a really nice touch in that upper register. The beat is nice and crisp, too. You clearly have a good sense of harmony and progression. The piece feels really dry, though. I think there’s a ton of potential for this piece to have a gorgeous, lush atmosphere. Everything about the sound design has a great emotional appeal, except the only thing missing was the reverb/delay effects that would’ve actually given it that atmospheric touch. Otherwise, the composition here is seriously vanilla. Very little sense of progression or growth over these 2.5 minutes. This piece is both repetitive and harmonically stagnant, unfortunately. Overall, I think with a bit more variety in the moving notes and a more generous approach to the mastering effects, this piece could be an ambient beauty with the perfect amount of punch. Right now, the composition’s just a tad underwhelming. Keep at it, KnockVoltage!

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
6.25/10

KnockVoltage responds:

Thanks for the feedback

[Blurred Vision]

I like the fun jazzy pads at the beginning. There’s a bit of atonality between the chords and the synth that comes in shortly thereafter. Creative rhythmic elements too. Texture seems a tad dry and bare, though. Some more reverb would help this piece out a lot, especially on the drums, and with the rapid changes in the chords, it’s hard to discern a sense of overarching direction to the piece. Some more prominent melodic content would help this piece out a lot. I also think it’s quite long, even considering the fast pacing. The piece really only starts coming together at around the 3-minute mark, and even then mid-range frequencies are surprisingly absent from the texture. The tempo automation into 3:54 was a good idea, but I think the transition there still came off as a bit sudden. This piece is very experimental harmonically, yet also doesn’t have a lot of cohesiveness, which would’ve given it a more down-to-earth structural appeal. The result is that you’re not really keeping the listener sufficiently grounded in any repetitive elements of the texture, and I think that’s both jarring and ineffective from a compositional standpoint. The ending is also pretty abrupt. Sounds like the piece doesn’t really have an overarching sense of direction. I’ve been tough on you in this review, but the instruments and harmonic progression within certain sections are both really cool here. I think you just need to consolidate a lot of your ideas, flesh out the texture, and make some more careful decisions about the structure overall. Harmonically unconventional pieces are fine, but pairing that with structurally unconventional techniques is really risky. There are a lot of fun ideas in this piece - rhythmically, harmonically, sound design-wise - but I’d like to see you give the composition a bit more coherence and regularity. Hope that helps. Keep at it, G4CE!

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.25/1
Composite score
6.5/10

[Timeless]

The eerie crash-equivalent at the beginning sounds cool, and gives way to a quirky atmosphere with the clock-ticking FX really smoothly. I like the bouncy synths at :21, and the panning on the sweeps and crashes was a nice touch. You do overuse the sweeps and crashes after a time, though. The melodic content at :55 was nice, and the mix here is really loud. A bit too much reverb, perhaps, but the climax into 1:16 is well done. The breakdown at around 1:40 sounds a little indistinct, but the quirky, frantic synth patterns at 1:45 are great, and they’re followed up by a lush melody at 2:05 that sits really well in the mix. Nice job tying this piece together with the final refrain, although the transition at 2:44 is a bit sudden. Overall, this is a well-structured and feel-good piece with a lot of cool melodic content, synths, and effects. My main concerns are that the excessive reverb is compromising the quality of the mix and that elements of the harmonic content sound a tad generic. Otherwise, keep up the good work, Equinaga! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
8.75/10

[You'll Get Yours]

I like the organic sound at the beginning. Starting the intro off with a shaker was a good idea. You have a really nice voice. It blends really well with the low-register guitar riffs. There aren’t a lot of higher-pitched tones in the first half of the piece or so. That might be an potential area for filling out the texture a little more if appropriate. I really like the lyrics themselves too. Great use of rhyme scheme and thematic content. I like how the texture begins to pick up at 1:23. The piece really starts coming together only in the second half or so, between the energy at 1:40 and the solo at 1:49. That was a risky move compositionally, but I think it totally paid off. The result is that the track feels really repetitive and also serves as a narrative form, with the grand conclusion “you’ll get yours and I’ll get mine” only coming to light at the end. Usually, I have reservations about pieces that only have one main climax as a focal point (because they often lack dynamism otherwise), but the progression here is curated really well. My main complaints here are that the piece is pretty repetitive harmonically, and that the texture could’ve been filled out a little more early on in the piece. Still, the mix is both loud and clear, the sound design is really good, and the passion is self-evident. Super strong work here, dude2312. By all means, keep it up! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
9.5/10

dude2312 responds:

Oh, my! TaintedLogic, it is an honor to have such a good review by you. Thank you, I always welcome feedback with open arms. I liked the fact that you think it is passionate, I really do try to put my best to it. I am barely starting to record on my own room, I try to do my best. Once again, thank you so much.

[Aqueous]

sFX at the beginning was a nice touch. The piano was really nice, too. It was flowing and majestic, yet also had a really tasteful rhythmic component. The guitar/harp-like instrument at :17 didn’t work quite as well for me, though. It sounded a tad inauthentic. I also think you overdid the kicks at :35, which detracted from the soothing atmosphere of the song. The quirky pad at :57 was a questionable instrumentation choice for similar reasons. As for the production quality, I think the lead ducks under the mix a bit at around 1:20. The drums are crisp and pretty loud, but some more careful equalization work might be needed to tighten things up a little. The melodic and harmonic content is really good, though. Compositionally, this piece is really satisfying. That said, I think you could’ve done more to vary the piece more later on. The breakdown at 3:15 was nice, but the delay effects on the higher-pitched elements were a bit much. Made it hard to follow the rhythm, even. The piece has a very uniform harmonic framework that I would’ve liked to see you break away from at some point. I also think you could’ve done more to offer an emotional height or climax at the end of the piece. Overall, strong work with the harmonic content, melodies, progression, and atmosphere. Elements of the sound design, mixing, and structure could use a second look, but you had me sold on the mood of this one. Keep at it, DeltaEagleNG!

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
7.25/10

[Thunder Man]

The riffs at the beginning are pretty catchy, although the synths sound a bit dry and unpolished. You also overuse the crashes, especially at around :26. You have a good sense of harmony, and the mix is pretty loud. I think the bass has a lot of higher frequencies, though, and you could do more to fill out the bass range of the texture. The loop is pretty smooth, although I think the composition could stand to be fleshed out a lot more, the fast pace and pleasing melodic content aside. My biggest complaints here are probably the cheesy sound design and the somewhat hard-to-follow progression. Nice job with the blissful mood, harmonies, and transitions, though. Keep at it, DCMegaFan!

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.25/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.25/1
Composite score
7/10