00:00
00:00
TaintedLogic

5,126 Audio Reviews

2,717 w/ Responses

2 reviews are hidden due to your filters.

I like the busy percussion at the beginning, although I think it gets a little lost in the mix once the gritty bass comes in at :07. Some more careful equalizing and compression could really help you out there. Also, the piece is very slow to progress, and the stop-start transition at 1:12 was pretty awkward. You start taking the piece in a totally different direction by 1:24, yet it’s still very minimalistic. Also, I think you overdid the reverb on the low percussion at 1:24 - it sounds a bit indistinct and buried under the guitar. Toning down the reverb and adding a compressor could really help give it some clarity. I like the brighter tone the piece has by around 2:45, but I’m still waiting for some strong melodic content, and the texture still isn’t very rich or full. Given the minimalism and lack of coherence of the piece structurally, I really don’t think this needed to be 7 minutes long. I think you need to consolidate your ideas and structure your piece in a way that keeps your listener grounded more. I like the pads at around the 5-minute mark. They added a climactic and conclusive tone to that section. Still, the extended minimalistic, rhythmic section at 5:40 was entirely unnecessary and added almost nothing to the overarching structure and tone of the piece. I think you can accomplish what this piece has to offer in half the length. The ending also cuts off a little suddenly. There are some good ideas here, but the pacing, minimalism, and lack of structural variety really detract from my enjoyment of the piece. Keep at it, CSJForrester!

4.25/10

This is a decent start to a piece, but really it just seems to be a couple of quick ideas laid out in succession. There’s very little compositional content here - just a couple of short riffs. The instrumentation is pretty amusing, but overall you really need to put more effort into this piece before it’s presentable for a competition like the NGUAC. I’d encourage you to keep working on it - I like the heavy mid-range bass and the ascending guitar synth line at :13. I’d suggest adding some reverb on those drums for the final product. There’s really not much else to say. You simply need more content here before I can judge it as a structurally complete piece. Keep working at it, man!

3/10  

I like the pensive mood at the beginning. The piece has a good sense of atmosphere, and the subbass was a nice touch. It’s a little slow to develop, though, and many of the instruments are a little generic. I enjoy the changes in energy levels throughout, although I think the mix could use a tad more clarity. You may have overdone the reverb on a few of these instruments - that could be part of the problem. The piece may also need some stronger melodic content. The lead at :54 sounds very square rhythmically, and only really has moving notes toward the end of each measure. Still, overall this is a strong piece. You have a good sense of harmony and flow. Keep at it, BluJayTunes! ;)

8/10

BlujayTunes responds:

Thank you! I definitely agree with your statements, I too noticed after a while my melodies got too repetitive, plus mixing is a thing i really need to work on. Glad to be in the next round!

I like the soothing guitar riff at the beginning. The rhythm gets a little frantic at around :13, which kinda sends off the wrong vibe given the mood at the beginning. There are a lot of sudden shifts in mood and pacing here that come across as quite jarring. The piece is also very short, and not truly complete from a structural standpoint. I think you could’ve done a lot more with the instrumentation. If you wanted to make a piece with only guitar and drums, I’d strongly encourage you to at least layer some harmonies on top of the content you have here. You also may want to widen the frequency range of your piece, because right now you’re not really taking advantage of the full spectrum. You’ll also need to vary the energy level and dynamics a lot more. This is a risky sort of minimalism here, and I don’t think it paid off this time. Sorry! You have a good sense of progression and harmony, but overall the composition here is pretty underwhelming. Keep at it, Bichenok. :)

5/10

The riff at the beginning is catchy, but I think you overdid the reverb. It sounds really muddy, which is why putting that much reverb on bass instruments is not usually a great idea. A lot of the instruments here are really generic and harsh-sounding in the mix. I think you need to use equalization to eliminate the harsh treble tones, and also the low frequencies in instruments besides the bass and kick. This piece has a lot of really sudden transitions, and adds and subtracts instruments in quite an arbitrary manner. I think you also went overboard on the distortion at 1:43. Despite the lack of cohesion, the piece is actually very minimalistic throughout. In the future, I’d highly recommend structuring your piece around some sort of melody instead of a couple of riffs that take turns dominating the texture. Harmonies, as well as variation in the drums, could also help you more effectively transition between sections of the piece. I’d encourage you to listen to one of your favorite pieces and analyze the structure, trying to mimic the structure in your own work until you get a better feel for how to keep the listener grounded. Once you feel like you’ve written a piece that’s a little more smooth-flowing and structured, send me a PM and I’ll leave you another review. Good luck! ;)

4.5/10

I like the riff at the beginning, although you may have gone a little overboard with the reverb - the instrument seems to have a lot of feedback. I wasn’t a huge fan of your drum samples - that kick has a lot of treble, and the snare was a bit dry. It’s also really easy to tell that the snare is getting distorted by the pads at :55. I think you need to be stricter about equalizing all of the instruments here and compressing the drums. It was a good idea to bring the piece full-circle with the riff at 2:00, but I think you needed a smoother transition there. The piece also has a sense of continuity without much structural variety - the energy levels don’t change all that much, and I’m not hearing anything in the way of dynamic contrast or phrasing. I want you to find more ways of creating variety besides adding and subtracting instruments over time - using filtering, volume levels, and automations could really add some emotion into this piece. The melodic content here is solid, though, and you have a good sense of harmony. Keep at it, BeeFef. :)

6.25/10

BeeFef responds:

Thanks. The reason why the drum samples sound a bit off is because I made them/recorded them myself. I'm still working on it. And I think the distortion on the snare is caused by the kick compressing with it sometimes during the faster part. I actually added like some sort of crunch sound to the snare for that part to make it sound better without the kick, but I guess it didn't work that well.

I hope I make it in!

I like the calm mood at the beginning, and how it quickly devolves into apprehension. The mix isn’t very loud, and I think the piano riff gets really buried by the instruments that come in at :26. The samples also aren’t of great quality or authenticity. The composition has a nice flow and phrasing, but could use some stronger melodic content. The percussion that comes in at 1:21 is pretty weak and dry - I really think you need to look into mastering skills like equalization, compression, and panning. The piece also ended a bit abruptly, and doesn’t quite feel structurally complete. Overall, you have a good sense of harmony and progression. Please work on mixing and mastering as a priority. Keep at it, Austing93! ;)

5/10

I like the atmospheric vibe at the beginning. I think the arpeggios need some of their treble tones equalized out. Otherwise, the piece is really well-balanced, and uses the frequency spectrum well. Nice job with the climax into :56, and the melodic content thereafter. While the drums are a little generic, they sit nicely in the mix - crisp and clear. I think the post-drop dragged on a little long (until 2:08, under my analysis). The piano melodies there were beautiful, though. You have a lot of talent for crafting atmospheres, my friend. I think the pacing is still a bit slow, but the part at 3:48 was beautiful once again. It disappointed me that you didn’t include much melodic development during the second half of the piece, but really that’s the only thing separating this piece from the 9-range. Keep up the good work, Attackofthetroy! :)

8.5/10

Attackofthetroy responds:

Wow thank you for the feedback! I'll be sure to look into some changes.

I like the pensive mood at the beginning. I think the square bass line is a little too loud compared to the melodic content that’s at a higher register. Overall, this piece needs way more humanizing and variety. It has a drab sense of continuity where it could really use some dynamic contrast, phrasing, and structural relief. The melodic content is enjoyable, though. The transition at 1:38 threw me off a bit - there wasn’t anything that foreshadowed it at all. Same thing with the change in pacing at 1:58. Overall, the composition here is pretty weak, and that’s what’s really dragging this piece down IMO. You clearly have a good sense of harmony, but I think you need to consider implementing variety along more parameters, especially since this is a solo instrument piece. Keep at it, Ardakio2! :)

5/10

ardakio2 responds:

Thanks for the review, i should try to apply your tips and growing as musician, i hope be better the next year. Respect and thanks a lot cx.

Hi. I'm Andrew. Audio portal junkie since 2010, supporter since 2017. I always want to improve what I do! I make music, run the NGUAC, post poetry on BBS, and am the all-time #2 audio reviewer. I love this site, and I want to make it the best I can! ^_^

Andrew Mikula @TaintedLogic

Age 27, Male

Policy Research

Bates College

Wellesley, Massachusetts

Joined on 8/16/12

Level:
22
Exp Points:
5,124 / 5,380
Exp Rank:
9,724
Vote Power:
6.38 votes
Audio Scouts
10+
Rank:
Police Officer
Global Rank:
14,027
Blams:
63
Saves:
626
B/P Bonus:
10%
Whistle:
Silver
Trophies:
5
Medals:
142
Supporter:
7y 11m 8d
Gear:
1