00:00
00:00
TaintedLogic

4,933 Audio Reviews

2,609 w/ Responses

I like the beats at the beginning. The chill guitars were cool, and then the string pads added to that relaxed aesthetic. I like the piano arpeggios around the 1-minute mark, but I think the drums get a little distorted by them. Same thing with the synths at around 1:30. You need to do a more careful job of equalizing all your instruments, and probably compressing your drums as well, especially since this is a D 'n' B track. The ending cuts off really suddenly, which I would've excused if it loops well (but it doesn't). I guess what really bothers me about this piece, though, is that you don't really have any predominant melodies, just a bunch of random ideas that are connected by this one simple guitar riff that first comes in at :12. Your ideas don't really have a discernible flow or progression to them that makes sense to me. You have string pads (:23), Reggae-sounding off-beat strums (:46), trance-like pianos (:57), classic rock organs (1:10), and videogame-style synths (1:31). These ideas dabble across genres and don't seem to be in any particular order. The string pads, strums, and organs might make an appropriate combination, but they never even play at the same time. The result is a thin and rather bland texture to a piece that's not very structurally pleasing. I want you to work on layering your harmonies more and aim for a fuller texture with bass, drums, pads, and melodies all playing at the same time. I like how you tried to create some structural relief at 1:19, but before you can effectively do that you need a bit more texture and drama to create more contrast in your work...because that's what music is, right? Creating a wave of emotion, ups and downs through layering various instruments on a track, making your listeners feel something, connecting you to them in some way. Anyway, this has potential, and after some stricter structural considerations, this could be a pretty solid track. Good luck, man. ;)

5.5/10

Spurta responds:

Thanks for the response on this one, man.
I didn't really know what I was doing all too much when I was making this, especially since I was mainly experimenting to be perfectly honest.

I love the cute mood at the beginning. The oom-pahs at :10 really gave it that elephant-like vibe, and the flute just contributes to the adorable and innocent themes. I liked the percussion that popped in at around the 1-minute mark. I think you may have needed some more rhythmic content (by which I mean drums and bass), however, just to keep the listener grounded a bit. The drums could also help aid in the transitions a bit, such as at 1:37. I will say that I think this piece has one of my favorite moods among the tracks I've reviewed so far for the competition. It's cute, mellow, and very flowing and thematic. The piece also loops very well, and has a very refreshing and upbeat sort of energy to it. Overall excellent work, SoundGalaxyOfficial! Keep it up. ;D

9/10

SoundGalaxyOfficial responds:

Thank you for your helpful thoughts and generous review!
I really need every single little tip from many different people, because I'm still new here as a content uploader. Although I started to study and play music when I was 7, I still need a lot of experience and helpful reviews like yours to develop my skills further.

I think I agree with you about the rhythmic content (additional drums and maybe some bass, or maybe I'll add timpani hits as an elephant stomp or something, I think that would sound even more comic and characteristic!), and probably I will change it a little bit later when I have more free time, after your contest ends, I think that's the fair way.

Or can I change it now? I mean, while the song is in the contest, can I change small things in it? The song would be the same song of course, but are smaller changes allowed in the songs that already posted?

I was wondering what would Newgrounds people think about particularly this song, because I couldn't find so many songs in this similar style, so I just posted it to your contest, because I wanted to see the reactions, and now I'm glad it looks like it turned out good!

Thank you for your tipps again,
and have a nice day! (You've made mine! :D)
- Sound Galaxy

I like the cute synths and progression. You have a good sense of rhythm and harmony. One thing I would warn you about is that some of the synths sounded a little too high-pitched and harsh, especially the one that comes in at :28. I think you needed a smoother transition at :42. The synths, while cute, are a little dry. Some reverb might help, but you may also need some less-pizzicato-y content in there. I think some drums would've really helped with some of the transitions (especially some crashes), as well as increasing the energy and drive of the piece a bit. I know this piece is supposed to loop, but there are a couple of seconds of silence at the end that sort of ruin that prospect. It sounds like you uploaded it with a wrapped remainder, but accidentally left a blank measure of two at the end. Either way, I think the simplicity detracts from this piece a bit. Your mixing isn't bad, but on the other hand it's hard to screw up the mixing when your piece is so dry and thin-textured. You could really make this piece excellent by spicing it up with some drums, effects, and pads, but until then it's a humble yet cute track that's certainly fitting for a videogame. :3 Keep at it, Sheeepie2. ;)

7/10

Sheeepie2 responds:

Thanks for the review :) I made this with LMMS, which I found it hard to find reverb and efects features (if there were any) However, my dad bought me FL Studio 12 this week, which I've found to be a lot easier to use, so I might try to do a remake of this piece with a thicker texture.

It's so hard to get a good drum pattern though :P

The chord progression is pretty cliché, but I like the upbeat mood and climactic nature of it. The transition at :45 didn't really lead much of anywhere IMO, although the filters you put there were pretty cool. You switch up the instruments quite a bit, but you don't really have a lot of melodic development or variation. Some of the risers, crashes, and transitions were cool, and I like the bass slide at the end. I don't think you did anything particularly unique or risky, however. I've heard a lot of upbeat techno and house songs just from judging this contest. You need to build more off of the two riffs that play at :47. Your melodies could've been a lot more memorable IMO. Your mixing wasn't that bad, though, and I do admire your sense of harmony and progression. I think I've used the term cliché before in this review, but if you avoid using such generic progressions as this and broadening your horizons a bit, you could go far in this competition. Keep at it, Razorrekker. ;)

7/10

Razorrekker responds:

Alright
Yeah some of my other stuff isn't as generic, or even genre specific. This was sort of intentionally cliche because I kind of love that chord progression. Build more off the riffs at :47? I don't know what you mean by that, but okay. Mixing: listening to this over and over, the kick should have been more noticeable IMO. Memorable melody? What's in a memorable melody? Sorry I don't know, and this might be obvious, but I would like to know. I just didn't know what people were looking for, so I didn't enter an extremely special song, as this was also the best work I had at the time. The filters at :45 were inspired by another song of this genre, so that's kind of where I got that from...
Thanks, Razorrekker
Anything else? just ask!

Haha, I like the title. The dark chords at the beginning are cool. I love the apprehensive mood and heavy bass synths. The snare at :33 was a little too heavy to be used for that kind of build-up. It sort of dominated the mix, distorting those risers a bit. I thought the vocal samples leading up to the drop were extremely amusing, and the drop itself was catchy and engaging, without being too all-over-the-place (like some brostep can be). I think you've done an excellent job in this piece of creating some space for yourself, especially during the breakdown at around 1:40. However, you didn't really bring anything fresh to the track after that, besides some new albeit similar vocal samples. I would've at least liked to see the second drop have some degree of variance from the first. You also could've done a lot more with the treble range of this track. Still, for what it is it's very amusing, although I'm not sure how serious to take it. ;) The mixing isn't bad either, though, so I'd say this is a solid track. Keep up the good work, Qixor! ^^

8/10

GameTime responds:

Thanks man! I really appreciate the feedback! A VIP of this track will come in the future and it will be much better!

I like the emotion in the beginning. Around :20, I think the piano and synth pads start distorting each other a bit. You might have to do some more careful equalizing there. I think it progresses really slowly, but I enjoyed the build-up into 1:01. It's well-structured and smooth-flowing, though. It might've needed a bit more dynamic contrast, but I admire your sense of harmony and progression. The ending is also pretty conclusive. I think you could've done a bit more with this piece. It's not the most unique - I'm seeing a lot of upbeat techno and house songs as I judge this competition. It also might need a bit more melodic development, and it's pretty repetitive too. Still, I like the mood and synths. If you had taken some more risks with this track (as well as cleaned up the mixing a little), this could be a really solid piece. Keep working at it, Polrock. ;)

6.5/10

It's catchy. I think the white noise at the beginning was a bit bland. You could've used some Lo-fi effects or something on it. Also, I'm not sure why you decreased the volume on the frantic synths at :16. It kind of caught me off guard. The instrument at :26 sounds a little harsh. I think it needs some more equalizing. I like the energetic and fast-paced nature of this piece, and I appreciate that you really went for a full texture here. However, I think you have some serious mixing issues. At :20, you can clearly hear the kick, for example. Then, by around :45, it gets lost under your frantic bass synths. Same thing with the piano and snare. I think an important next step could be to educate yourself on how to use equalizers, compressing, and panning to your advantage in whatever program you use to make music. That said, I like the melodies at 1:10 and the piano solo at around 1:30. You have a lot of quirky instruments (like at 1:50) in here, but your melodies are rather cool and well-varied. It's a very long piece, yet it keeps my attention rather well. I also really like what you did with the filters on that lead at 5:27. The ending cuts off a little suddenly, but that's not a huge problem (probably more of an error when uploading the piece than anything else). I think you're really good at harmonizing, and this piece is structurally sound and smooth-flowing (although you do overuse the crashes a bit as transitions, no?). I also think you could've used more reverb on a lot of your instruments to make them sound more connected and smooth. Still, the mixing is my main problem with this piece. Compositionally, this is really admirable work. Keep it up, Pi0run-V. ;)

8/10

Pi0run-V responds:

I completely agree with you. I still didn't exactly learn how to use equalizers etc. :\ In 0:16 It was an error of filter on this instrument. I planned to make Uplifting Trance track so I thought it will be better when I add here many transitions, some of them could damage the instruments.
Anyway, I'm glad you think it's an admirable and well composed track.
Thanks for your review! :)

That's a very heavy and sub-bassy kick you got there. I often try to create two peaks with the kick, one that's in the sub-bass range and another that's around 500 Hertz. Still, I enjoyed the apprehensive mood at the beginning and the dark instruments. That pulsing lead was cool too. The synth that comes in at :41 sounds like it needs to be equalized more. Together with the pulsing lead it sounds really harsh, probably because they both have too many treble tones. The second half of the piece was very repetitive, and the ending was too sudden. This is not a structurally complete piece in my opinion. It only really has one climax, which peaks from around :40 to 2:05. You need some sort of breakdown or re-intro at some point before you create some melodic development and dynamic contrast in the second half of the piece (which you never did). It is a rather smooth-flowing piece, though, and I admire your sense of harmony and progression (despite my complaints about the structure and equalizing). The mixing also isn't that bad. If you account for these complaints, I think you'll have a pretty solid piece. Keep at it, Omnicrown. ;)

7/10

I like the organic guitar sound at the beginning. The vocals are generally good, but I think you need to enunciate your consonants more because it's hard to determine what you're saying at times. I would appreciate it if you left the lyrics in the description in the future. It's a pretty well-structured piece, and I like the warm, feel-good vibe it has. The simplicity gives it a really human quality. The ending was a bit sudden and inconclusive IMO. I also think the echo effects you used at 1:42 sort of detracted from the organic, down-to-earth vibe I thought you were going for. You probably could've done more with dynamic contrast and melodic development, too. Still, I admire your sense of harmony and progression, and it's a very smooth-flowing piece. Overall, I like it! Keep up the good work, Norway69. ;)

7.5/10

Norway69 responds:

Thanks Tainted. Most of music on here is experiments I do, and layer by layer did it as you say on the spot. I have a feeling I will rerecord it in the future and do it properly because it turned out quite nice :)

I like the quirky instrument at the beginning. It progresses pretty slowly. I think you need a smoother transition at :27. Also, the synth you introduce there sounds really harsh and high-pitched. I think you need to equalize it more carefully to get rid of some of those treble tones. I liked the riser building up to :55, and the drop was cool without being overly heavy. You change moods dramatically at 1:25. One second it's heavy, punchy electronica, and then the next it's light, flowing piano music. I think you should've at least used the "softer" version of the lead at 1:37 to sort of connect the drop and the breakdown section a bit more. I think the middle minute or so of this piece offered some highly-valued structural relief, though, which is good. One major complaint I have is that you don't really bring any fresh ideas to the piece after the breakdown. The two drops sound exactly the same, and this is a repetitive piece regardless because the lead riff that first comes in at :00 is playing for almost the entire piece. I think the mixing wasn't bad, and I like the way the arpeggios sort of pulse in and out at :27 (and other places). Still, this piece is severely lacking in melodic development and overall variation. It's structurally sound, though, with some cool instruments and moods. I also like the effects at 3:15 (and other places). Overall, pretty solid work. Keep at it, NevoMusic. ;)

7.5/10

NevoMusic responds:

Thanks a bunch for the review! There was lots of helpful feedback there, if I make it to the next round I'll certainly try to incorporate everything you've pointed out. I agree that this track lacks melodic development, I should have made some type of melody or something to help this song progress a bit better. I'm glad you liked many of my effects, this was one of the first songs I made my own effects for. Also at around 2:48 I changed the automation for about 8 or 16 bars of the drop(I don't remember which), but the change was very subtle and I expect no one other than those who read this to tell the difference.
Anyways, thanks for the review. I'm very pleased with 7.5 out of 10!

Hi. I'm Andrew. Audio portal junkie since 2010, supporter since 2017. I always want to improve what I do! I make music, run the NGUAC, post poetry on BBS, and am the all-time #2 audio reviewer. I love this site, and I want to make it the best I can! ^_^

Andrew Mikula @TaintedLogic

Age 26, Male

Policy Research

Bates College

Wellesley, Massachusetts

Joined on 8/16/12

Level:
21
Exp Points:
4,832 / 4,900
Exp Rank:
9,937
Vote Power:
6.32 votes
Audio Scouts
10+
Rank:
Police Officer
Global Rank:
13,953
Blams:
63
Saves:
626
B/P Bonus:
10%
Whistle:
Silver
Trophies:
4
Medals:
142
Supporter:
7y 3m 15d
Gear:
1