TaintedLogic's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[RetroMania - Main Theme]

I like the bright tone at the beginning and the crisp percussion. Some of the drum patterns seem a bit square and cheesy (with some overused tom rolls and crashes at times), though the classic rock organ and spacey pads give the piece a strong sense of atmosphere. The melodies at :52 are nice too, and the upbeat mood and sound design help me stay engaged. I think the piece could use a bit more structuring, though, as the energy level and most of the instrumental palette stay pretty constant throughout. There are also some abrupt transitions in places, like at 3:20. The ending came on a tad suddenly; I’d suggest either a full-volume flourish or a more gradual fade-out. That said, I really like the instrumentation, production quality, atmosphere, and harmonic content of this piece overall. Keep at it, Manvineo! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
8/10

Manvineo responds:

Thank you so much for the review, Tainted <3. I am so honored to be judged by a professional like you. Reading your review gave me the determination to hone my craft in composing so that by the next NGUAC, I might create a piece that you and the other future judges might find satisfactory.

[Bro I'm straight up having a good time]

At first, the fade-in at the beginning sounded somewhat ominous to me, but by :05 or so I’m fully invested in the blissful vibe of this piece. I wish the drums were a bit more prominent in the texture towards the beginning. That said, the sound design (including the quirky chopped vocals and bubbly VGM synths) is great, and the melodies are catchy and upbeat. In the second half of the piece, it would’ve been nice if you had added more variety to the vocal lines and melodies, but I appreciated the compositional details like the drum fill at 2:08 and the layering of the vocals over the melodies at 2:37. Overall, really fun piece, Ko0x! The sound design, mixing, rhythmic content, and melodies are all super enjoyable here. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
8.75/10

ko0x responds:

Thank you very much for this positive and detailed feedback :) <3

[Rise of Hope [NGUAC]]

I like the acoustic sound design and waltzy vibe at the beginning. The whimsical string lines at :32 and reverb-heavy atmosphere really contribute a lot to the texture, and you do a great job of giving the composition a dynamic feel. The mallets at 1:45 are especially nice - I wish they were a bit more prominent in the mix, actually. The upbeat mood and cutesy sound design really win me over here. If I had to criticize one thing, it might be that the progression feels a bit slow-paced at times, but in the context of the piece, that often helps to sell the emotional qualities here. Overall, the composition, sound design, production quality, and atmosphere are all great. Keep it up, Jotrocken! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9.25/10

Jotrocken responds:

Thanks TaintedLogic for sending me feedback after you finished judging phase. Glad you liked the dynamic feel, there is a lot of effort. Mallet could be more in focus at 1:45 right. Gonna start my Final now hope you all like it as much as you liked this one :)

Very happy with this result.

[Starting Anew]

I like the tranquil piano line at the beginning. The violin at :18 was also a good idea, and overall the texture sounds rich and full despite only containing two main instruments. The melodies at :45 are beautiful, and you’ve done a great job of giving the composition a strong sense of storytelling and dynamism despite its short length. The emotional appeal of sections like 1:20 is great. Towards the end, I think you overuse the stop-start transitions a tad, but overall I’m really impressed with the progression, harmonic content, production quality, and sound design here. Keep it up, Jesse! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9.25/10

JesseTikka responds:

Didn't even come think that a transition type could be overused, but good point. Thanks a lot!

[KO ROUND: Gyaru Death 2010]

I like the white noise at the beginning and the echo-y vocals. The eerie pads at :15 are nice too, and the drums have a really gritty and grating sound. The melancholy chords contrast nicely with the energy and drive of the drum patterns. I also like the brighter tone of the piece at around 1:15. The texture is a bit minimal at times - not a lot of action in the bass range. Layering on a sub-bass or even some low chords might’ve helped round things out better. Earlier on, the piece is missing some treble tones too. That said, the production quality is really strong, and I love the sound design later on with the dreamy upper-range phasing synths. Overall, the composition is a bit bland, though, with not a lot of memorable melodies or dynamism within the phrases. Still, I’m enjoying the atmosphere, mixing, rhythmic content, and progression here. Keep at it, JarJarZoinks! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
7.25/10

2keg responds:

thanks for the review Mr.Logic. Never had a track get a proper review so I appreciate a lot bruv :3

[Burning Jungle]

I like the cutesy riff at the beginning. The synth sounds a bit dry, though, and could probably use some reverb or other mixing effects to give it more of a sense of atmosphere. I’m enjoying the sense of build into :43, and the quirky percussion thereafter is refreshing and catchy. Some of the instruments in here are pretty generic, though, like the synth lead at 1:02, the mid-range bass at :13, and the snare at :17. The mixing and mastering are pretty good, although the piece is a tad over-compressed at times. I also think you could’ve fleshed out the composition a tad more here. I wanted to see some more depth in the harmonies, memorable melodic content, and thicker textures that give the piece a stronger sense of ebb and flow. That said, the rhythmic content, atmosphere, and production quality of this piece are all quite good. Keep at it, Ivki! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
6/10

enipoint responds:

Oh, ty (☆▽☆) (btw, I made it in fl studio mobile 3 :p)

[The Old Days]

I like the catchy guitar riffs at the beginning and the rich harmonies. You’ve done a great job of capturing a nostalgic vibe between the sound design and melodies, and I like the crisp drums and subtle filtering at :40 too. The switch-up in the drum pattern at 1:05 was a welcome change, but the instrumental tracks get a bit repetitive after a while. Later in the piece, I would’ve liked to hear some novel content - a bridge in a different key, or even some variation on the main melody. That said, you nailed the mixing, sound design, atmosphere, and mood of this one. Keep at it, Fumijena! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
7.25/10

Fumijena responds:

thanks so much for your feedback <3 glad you liked it as it is!

[Knock Out]

I like the ominous atmosphere at the beginning and the quirky riser at :16. The vocal sample at :27 made me chuckle. The minimal texture at :28 made the previous 27 seconds feel a bit anticlimactic, and I also wasn’t a huge fan of the heavy stereo clicks and generic drums. The rhythmic content is rather enjoyable, but I would’ve liked to hear some more dynamic harmonies and a stronger sense of progression over time for most of this piece. Otherwise, the composition falls a little flat here, despite the occasional cool transition and some wise sound design choices later on (like the ghostly synth at 2:19, for example). The production quality is strong here, and the increase in the pacing of the bass line at 2:47 was another fun idea. The filtering on the basses and ghostly synths later on helped add some variety too, but overall the composition is still pretty bland. Still, the transitions, vocals, rhythmic content, and mixing all won me over here. Keep at it, EvilDemon01! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
6/10

Qilin responds:

Thank you for this great response. Really helps me to figure out what to focus on more :)

[Inevitability]

I like the piano arpeggios at the beginning and the warm string pads. The distortion at :30 was a nice touch during the build-up. The beat at :33 is pretty cool, but the instrumental tracks there are a tad bland, and the piano gets a bit lost in the mix there. I’m enjoying the additional layer of harmonies at 1:00 and the glitchy vocals at 1:27. The glitches were a good way of switching up what otherwise would’ve been a pretty generic vocoder sample - maybe some more reverb or other mixing effects could’ve further added some interest to the vocal line. The beats at 1:53 are once again refreshing, and I especially like the added dose of pitch-bending during that section. At some point in this piece, I would’ve liked to hear some more prominent melodic content, as a lot of the basis for staying engaged is in the quirky sound design and rhythms, which are delivered in a couple of relatively dragged-out drop sections with pretty uniform energy levels. By the end, the vocals also feel a bit overused, although I do appreciate the extent to which you’ve modified them. Overall, I really like the production quality, rhythmic content, sound design, and atmosphere of this piece. Some of the compositional elements could’ve used some more creativity, including the harmonic patterns and arrangement, but the experimental texture helps keep things interesting, and I appreciate the haunting lyrics - in that context, the robotic-sounding vocoder fits in rather well here. Keep at it, Eccentra! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.25/1
Composite score
7.75/10

Eccentra responds:

I truly appreciate the very detailed analysis of the track! It's an eyeopener to see where I've gone wrong and now I'm enlightened to improve more on the creative aspects!