TaintedLogic's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[Lamentation]

Octatonic scale! Fancy. It sounds inherently a little melancholic, especially with the dissonant notes at around :22 and other places. It has a smooth sense of continuity, yet also seems very succinct and well-structured. I also like the little turns and ornaments (e.x.: 1:17). The mood at 1:39 got much more blissful and reserved, and I like how you kept the sound nice and spacious going into the breakdown section at 1:58. You use modulations a lot. In my opinion, 2:25 didn't do much to add a sense of direction to the piece. Sometimes varying the melody is a more meaningful way of creating a final climax rather than simply modulating it. Either way, cool piece. The ending didn't seem as fleshed out as it could've been, but this piece has a great mood about it. Nice work, BO. ;)

[Tribute to Detektivbyrån - Re-recording]

Upbeat, flowing, and busy. Gives me a sense of a group of men in top hats walking down the street, trying to decide which bar to go in to celebrate Frank's birthday. It's a short piece, but there's very little structure except for a little ritardando at 1:14 before the coda. I would've liked to see this fleshed out more, with some more highs and lows dynamically and emotionally. That's pretty much my only complaint, though. Keep up the good work, Ale!

LucidShadowDreamer responds:

Hey! Two years ago, you thought this sounded like spring, but also like montage music! Which fits well with the tophats xD
I also must be doing something right, since this re-recording has half a star more!

Wait... What does the ritardado have to do with structure? Perhaps you mean variation in the arrangement? That, there is indeed not, nor did I want there to be, since this is just something I did for fun many years ago.

Dynamically, there are highs and lows in the composition, but I think your critique once again, falls on the slightly flat arrangement, which is fair. I wanted this to be pretty upbeat all the way through, even though there is another ritardando at 0:40, which you mentioned in your previous review!

Thanks for checking by! Any music of your own in the works? I noticed a couple days ago that you uploaded a new track, and I haven't gotten a chance to check it out yet, so I'll do so after responding to your next review :D

[I Dream of the Future]

I dream of the future, too. This is a beautiful piece, Ale. It has a great innocence about it, and a fantastic sense of progression and flow as always. The transition at 1:10 was a bit sudden. Maybe it would've worked if the bass line kept playing, but otherwise it's too abrupt for my tastes. It's usually hard to pick out structural elements in your piano solos, and this is no exception, but at least this piece was held together by the ever-ascending bass lines. It feels victorious and cute at the same time by the end, although I think you could've used a ritardando on that last counterpoint so that it didn't feel as rushed. Still, always a pleasure hearing your music, LSD. I should have more time to Skype next week since my semester just ended. ^^

LucidShadowDreamer responds:

The transition at 1:10 is indeed a bit sudden! I happen to have an affinity for sudden transitions though. Wouldn't it be boering if all music was 100% predictable all the time? I mean, psychologically speaking, we seem to enjoy when we recognize music and can guess what's coming next, so I guess it makes sense. But since I don't tend to write party music, I like being swept away and just floating with the music, wherever it takes me!

I find it quite easy to pick out structural elements here, since there are more than usual in this song. But, then again I know all the chords and the melodies by heart, whereas other listeners would have to listen quite a few times before they get the hang of it.
There is actually a lot of repetition in this song, though the keys change now and then. But the arrangement changes a bit too, from here to there.

1:58 takes you back to the beginning of the theme, and builds up to the more expressive ending.
And there is a refrains played more than once in the middle (with a few variations), with a couple of diffrent bridges (only one of which repeats slightly), and then there's the middle section which had the abrupt transition. Allow me to lay out the entire structure, the way I see it:

0:00 - 0:37 = Intro (which is a segment which repeats more or less the same melody twice)

0:38 - 0:54 = A bridge to the main refrain, although it is also a type of variation of the refrain melody

0:55 - 1:09 = The main refrain, where the second half builds into that abrupt transition

1:10 - 1:25 = A random middle section which is kinda just there, in order to get some rhythmic and arrangement variation (note the left hand which plays something entirely different here). Note that the end of this segment builds into a bridge with the same style as the ending of the last bridge, simply in a different key.

1:26 - 1:33 = Here we welcome back the main refrain, but only for a sec until there is a new buildup for an even bigger refrain.

1:34 - 1:41 = A unique bridge

1:42 - 1:57 = A slight variation of the main refrain, in order to sound a bit more heavy (not metal). The end of the segment transitions back to the intro melody...

1:58 - 2:38 = This is a repeat of the intro, in all its glory, but with a more upbeat arrangement, since the beginning was taking it kind of slowly. The chords and melodies are the same though (the melody gets more varied close to the build up to the grand outro), as is the key.

2:39 - The grand outro

So there ya go :)
I don't think it's the fact that the piece would lack any structure which makes it difficult to analyze. I think it's the fact that there is more structure, which changes quicker than say a piece with a "intro, verse, verse, refrain, verse, verse, bridge, refrain, refrain, outro" formula. Because it's not quite as simple, it takes more mental energy and devotion to pick out all the parts, based on the actual chords and melodies. Especially since there's no song to go along. I just want to to know that I am very aware of precisely how my songs are built up, or I'd have quite a difficult time playing them. Other than that, I tend to use more key changes than most tracks, because I personally just like key changes.

I do agree with your comment about the ritardando at the end. I too realized it sounds rushed, but tbh, I was just lazy and let it be xD
See, I put more energy into the last five notes, which I think sound funny, since they're entirely unconventional (one of them is intentionally out of key, too!).

I have one exam left this coming monday, and then I have to prepare for Xmas! I have a huge extended family, so there's a lot to do. But after Christmas, and before my studies start again, I too should have more time, so I really look forward to talking to you!

Be well, until then ^ ^

[Valliant]

I like the melody and progression. I wasn't a huge fan of the samples, but I think you already acknowledged that you're aware of their lack of quality. It sounds like it's peaking on those higher-pitched notes at :25. I might suggest using a diminuendo to soften up that melody line a bit. For a piano solo, it sounds a bit square. Have you tried humanizing it? For example, I think a ritardando from 1:26 to 1:31 would really add a nice spacey quality to the piece. I appreciated the modulation at 1:45, though. "Valiant" is certainly a fitting title for the piece. I appreciated that you experimented with dynamics a lot in this piece, but I think you could've made it more subtle at times. Overall, this is a textbook upbeat BlueOceans piece for your triumphant return to music-making (and my return to reviewing)! Keep it up, BO. :)

[Amethyst]

I like the busy beat at the beginning. It might've been nice to compress that percussion even more, though. I wasn't sure I was overly fond of the bass sample you used, but I enjoyed when it started developing a little more at around the 1-minute mark. The melodies you had there were a little dissonant, which is fine, but it was just a little jarring to connect the bass line in the beginning and the part at 1:02. I would suggest you use some chords or harmonies to really tie those themes together. I think the main factor there is that the baseline, which has been ingrained in my mind as the established theme of the piece by then, stops at 1:02, and this melody that feels a little out-of-place starts. The part at 2:17 was probably my favorite, especially after you launch into the modulation at 2:31. There's just so much tension in that part, and it leads back into the main melody at 2:47 really well. The melody instrument is quirky and wet, which is good. I should also mention that I think your mixing is great here. There's a lot of space in the mix, and I can hear everything clearly. I wish you had done something more with that final refrain at 2:47, though, just to offer some melodic development. Otherwise, the last 2 minutes or so of the piece kinda drag on a bit too long. Overall, this is an enjoyable piece. Sorry I haven't really been around to send too many reviews your way recently, but hopefully that will change after I'm between semesters in 2 weeks. Keep up the good work, TeraVex! ;)

[Abeyance [PV]]

Good to see you're still active around these parts! I had an intuition to check your page, and lo and behold, a new preview. Sounds new-wavey if you're still looking for a genre. :) Loving the atmospheric vibes and the chill beats. The instruments here blend really well together. It has a great sense of continuity about it, as a lot of your tracks do. Keep up the good work. Looking forward to the final product!

SynchroSpectre responds:

Oh hey dude, its been awhile. It's a little rusty but i'm just getting back into the swing of things. The final product is on soundcloud and utoob lol. Nice to see you again m8!

[eating ice cream with a cute girl]

Sounds good to me (the eating ice cream with a cute girl part, not the song). But seriously, the song sounds really good too. I like the pizzicato-y approach you've taken to the melody this time, as you usually have more legato melodies, especially later in the piece. The staccato, echo-y harmonies also gave this piece a really frantic, fleeting character, like all my relationships with cute girls have been so far. :) ...eh, who am I kidding? What relationships. But enough about my depressing love life. This song is very upbeat and catchy. You used the panning effects really well around 2:00, and it has a good sense of climax into 2:45. The mixing and mastering are solid as usual. I love the melodic development here. The descending lines at 3:15 made me want to have a girlfriend so bad. I really am a sad little man. UGH...ANYWAY: the ending was a little rushed, but otherwise not entirely pitiful. ;) Keep up the good work, Johnfn! Maybe I'll review the rest of your new stuff around Thanksgiving. XD

johnfn responds:

best review ever TL will u b my girlf pls

[hope]

I was wondering when you were going to get back to making piano solos! I like this a lot. It sounds bright, cute, and...dare I say hopeful? If I have to be really picky, the low notes at :44 come in a little too heavily and abruptly after the very light, melodic opening, and they continue to dominate the melody a bit until around the 1-minute mark. Once the piece gets a little more full-sounding (~1:20) it sounds good with the low notes, but I'm going to defend my nitpicks here. Still, you really know how to bring out emotion well with these piano solos. My favorite is still "Snowy Night." Keep up the good work, man. ;)

[microcosm]

Microcosm is a very good name for a song. It's almost like some soon-to-be-famous Newgrounder did it back in 2013. Catchy melodies as usual. The bass was a little too loud IMO, but the mastering is good. I think you overdid the reverb on the crash at 1:49. Well-structured, smooth-flowing, the usual suspects. Your endings are becoming increasingly less cringe-worthy. Also, good to see you branching out from that one genre you always make (sorry; I'm in a snarky mood today). Still, I like how it's upbeat, and it has a great sense of structural ebb and flow. Keep it up, Johnfn. ;)

johnfn responds:

Thanks TL! Actually, I write tons of non chipstep songs all the time, but I just never release them.

lol jk

Also I completely agree, Microcosm is the best name for a song!

[Volt]

Yeah. I remember listening to this one for the first time several months ago. It got my foot tapping immediately, and it still does. You usually master your tracks very loudly, but I think this one is especially crisp and clear. Well-structured, catchy and melodic. I thought you began to overuse the crashes at 1:15, but the drop at 1:45 was well worth the wait. I think my favorite part of the piece is actually 2:45, when the dichotomous characters (edgy and bass-heavy; blissful and melodic) both come through simultaneously. This piece has one of my favorite endings of any of your tracks, btw. It almost sounds sneaky, yet in a conclusive sort of way, as if the police finally show up and everyone at the party disperses and heads back to campus. XD Really admirable work. Keep it up, Kyle! :D

Lockyn responds:

Really glad you like the 2:45 section, 3:00 and onwards was definitely really really cool to construct. Ending was nice in my eyes too, loved using those light bell arp sounds! Thank you for the kind words, I'm glad you enjoyed :)