TaintedLogic's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[Another Day of Endless Pain]

I like the catchy synth riffs and the minimal percussion at the beginning. The synths themselves sound a tad cheesy and generic, but the melody synth at :29 is also pretty quirky and fun. The first melodic section does drag on for a bit too long with only minimal changes to the harmonies, but I like the extra percussion line at 2:10. The breakdown/re-intro at 2:12 was a good idea, as was slowing the pacing of the chord progression down at 2:41. Other than that, the piece gets a bit repetitive and predictable after a while. After 3:10 or so, I felt like I had heard all there was to hear, tbh. There was that section with the faster bassline at 4:09, but it might’ve been nice to switch up the harmonic framework/chord progression entirely at some point. I also might’ve liked to hear a less abrupt ending here, perhaps with a fuller outro. In terms of mixing, your drums could’ve been a bit punchier - I’d look into adding some compression on them. Still, this piece is catchy, well-structured, and has some really nice melodies. Keep at it, BigBlueBazooka! You earned a scout. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.25/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
6.5/10

BigBlueBazooka responds:

Thanks for the feedback. I will take onboard what you said.
and thanks for scouting me.

[Worlds Between]

I like the quirky synth arpeggios at the beginning and the heavier guitar riff that comes in shortly thereafter. This piece has nice, crisp drums and a loud, well-balanced mix. The transition into the more tranquil section at :33 was a bit abrupt, but I loved the solos at 1:05. The gritty, rhythmic bridge at 1:46 came on a tad suddenly, but I love the jumpy solo at 2:20 and the brief, jangly section at 3:00. I like how you brought the synth arpeggios back at 3:20 - truly a full-circle piece. The ending was pretty abrupt, though. In fact, the biggest complaint I have here is that elements of the arrangements are pretty disjointed. Otherwise, though, you’ve made a catchy, expressive, and well-mastered piece that’s full of variety (and killer solos!). Rock on, BOE! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9.25/10

BeyondOurEyes responds:

Thank you for the amazing score and constructive feedback, greatly appreciated! <3

[Far Beyond]

I like the suspenseful mood at the beginning and crisp string riff at :15. Once the drums come in, the compression is a bit heavy for my tastes, and I think the sidechaining distorts the string lines more than is necessary. The breaks at 1:14 were really catchy and intense, but that section also seemed a bit too dragged-out. Adding the vocals during the bridge was a great idea, but the processing on them was a bit heavy compared to the orchestral flair of the rest of the piece. The lyrics themselves are also enjoyable, though, and I liked the build-up into 3:00. I might’ve liked to hear a little more variety in the drop the second time around compared to the first, but it was still an effective way of hitting the piece home. Overall, I commend you for the clean mix, progression, sound design, and atmosphere of this one. Some aspects of the piece seemed a bit over-produced, and aspects the arrangement were a bit generic, but otherwise you’ve made a dramatic, catchy, and compelling track here, Benji. Keep it up! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
8/10

Benji-G responds:

Hey thank you TaintedLogic! I greatly appreciate the effort you make to give us such detailed reviews, they're incredibly helpful.

[Unsichtbar]

I like the echo-y bass growl that plays every 2 measures during the first minute. The lead synth is pretty bland and dry - some more mixing effects on it might help keep me engaged during what is otherwise a pretty slow-paced intro. I like the furtive feel at :53, although the long stop-start transition at 1:26 didn’t quite work for me. It also threw me off that the guitars totally took over the texture at 1:30 - I would suggest at least introducing the guitars earlier to foreshadow its role as the lead instrument later on. I also would’ve liked to hear some more melodic content earlier on in the piece, especially since the “verses” in the piece are so repetitive. I like the transition into 3:16 and the additional atmospheric elements there. The mixing is pretty good overall, although the drums could’ve been punchier with a bit more compression. The key change at 4:26 was a good idea, although I thought the transition into it could’ve been smoother. In retrospect, 4:26 was a good way of concluding the piece, as it’s easily the most melodic and memorable part. That said, I still wanted to hear more melodic content and a fuller texture earlier. The outro at 5:20 has some neat phasing and panning effects, too. Overall, you have a good sense of harmony and some decent mixing skills. I’m not always a huge fan of your sound design choices, and some of the arrangement details in this track could use more effort. Still, you’ve put together a catchy piece with a well-balanced mix and a killer final solo here. Keep at it, BBaNK! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
7.25/10

BBaNK responds:

Thanks for the review TL, appreciate it!

[Looking Out]

Are those amen break samples? :D They actually work pretty well in the context of this piece, especially since you chopped them up. I like the eerie atmosphere and fat sub-bass at :12. The piece is a bit slow to progress beyond that, but the filtering at :45 is cool, and the dreamy mid-range pads at :48 are a nice addition to the texture. The chiptune-y synth at 1:00 caught me a bit off guard, but I’m really digging how they jive with the gritty pads at 1:36. The thin, frantic vocals at 2:01 are great as well, and the stop-start transition at 2:26 led really nicely into the re-integration of those vocals into the earlier beat you had playing. The transition at 2:48 was a bit abrupt, and I wasn’t a huge fan of when you made an already-minimal piece even more minimal at around 3:00. Overall, this is a really catchy piece with some neat sound design and solid progression. The piece is frequently lacing in mid-range frequencies and harmonic content, and I think you could’ve done more to create variety here besides introducing new instruments later on in the piece. Still, you won me over with some of the flashier riffs here, like at 1:36 and 2:01. The production quality is top-notch here, btw. Keep at it, BassClefff! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
7.75/10

[HO+HO+NH2]

Honestly, I wasn’t a huge fan of the distorted texture - very harsh and grating sound design here, honestly. The beats are catchy, although there isn’t a lot of harmonic content to keep me grounded structurally. The transition at 1:06 is cool, although some of the other ones are pretty abrupt. The spacey atmosphere at 1:41 is nice, but given the pacing of the rest of the piece I think that section drags on for a tad too long. Overall, I think you’ve made an experimental piece with a jarring texture that doesn’t really display the variety of compositional skills we’re looking for at the NGADM. The rhythmic content is good, and a lot of the sound design details are creative and engaging, but, quite frankly, to get a decent score on most of the categories in my judging rubric, you needed to rein in some of these volume levels and do more with harmonies. Sorry! If you have other stuff that’s more tonal, feel free to send me a PM, and I’m happy to given you some more feedback. Cheers.

Mixing, mastering, and balance
.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
0/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.25/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
0/1
Composite score
3.5/10

[Universal Pulse]

I like the dreamy synth riffs at the beginning, and the eerie harmonies that come in shortly thereafter. The progression is a bit slow-paced, but by the time the crisp drums and guitars come in at :43, I’m starting to feel the groove more. The reverb on the drums is a bit heavy for my tastes, and the snare sample sounds a tad thin and high-pitched too. The chord progression and arrangement of the piece are a bit generic. I really like the way the piece slowly builds up to 1:25, although the synth melody there was a tad cheesy and generic-sounding. I also wasn’t a huge fan of the pulsating pads at 2:00 - they were a little disorienting at first, and also have too much reverb IMO. I like how you stripped away the beat at 2:25, and then immediately offered some contrast in the energy level with the killer guitar solo at 2:40. You transitioned well back into the refrain at 3:16, although I might’ve liked to hear a little more variety on some of those main riffs and melodies the second time around. Still, the piece comes together well by the end, and the mix holds up well despite the busy texture there. Overall, despite my complaints with the instrumentation and compositional details, you’ve clearly displayed your strong production, melody-writing, and progression skills here. Keep at it, Barbier! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.25/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
7.25/10

BarbierDoesMusic responds:

Hey, thanks for the feedback! Yeah, at this point I was still getting the hang of using my virtual instruments, also the lack of time due to my personal challenge of posting a song per week to train more my music making skills. Still, I'm really glad you liked it (specially the guitar solo, it also was my fav part to make :D).

Welp, it sucks that I didn't get to the competition this year, but will shoot for the next, as well as the NGUAC to see what happens. Thanks for the opportunity and for checking out!! ^^

[Fistula]

I like the crisp guitar riff at the beginning and the dissonant harmonies. The drums at :13 are mixed very strangely, with not a lot of room for the kick or snare, but a relatively prominent hat/crash. The echo-y, sighing riff at :25 is pretty nice, and blends in well with the rest of the texture. The arrangement of the piece feels a tad formulaic, with different instruments regularly added and subtracted, but little in the way of variety in the harmonic framework or otherwise. I would’ve liked to see you flesh out the structure a bit more, and create a bit more ebb and flow in the composition within a given phrase/section. Otherwise, this piece has a lot of enjoyable individual elements, from the rhythmic syncopations to the echo-y guitar melodies. Keep at it, BALDORF! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.25/1
Composite score
6.25/10

[Avixel - Nexus]

I like the emotional appeal of the piano at the beginning. The smooth, muted bass and acoustic drum kit work well too, and the subtle wah-wah guitar riff is a nice addition to the texture. Other than that, the composition is a bit underwhelming here. The piece has a very repetitive and general harmonic framework, and despite the neat sound design, the way the frequencies are balanced in the mix doesn’t really show off the instruments very well. For example, the piano chords at :19 are a lot louder than the funky guitar riff, and I think it should be the other way around based on which one is more dynamic and interesting. Some more dynamic melodies or solos also would’ve been welcome at some point - jazz is known for giving each of its harmonic instruments a big chance to shine. Overall, I hope you’ll keep working on this piece. It has a lot of potential, but I want to see a bit more risk-taking with the composition and a more well-rounded production first. Keep at it, Avixel! :)

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
6/10

[Velum]

I like the smooth synth guitar riff at the beginning and the dreamy arpeggios that come in shortly thereafter. There’s a LOT of reverb in the texture for my tastes, but as far as I can tell it doesn’t distort the mix too much. The breathy, chopped vocals at :52 are nice, and the rhythmic content in the bass during the drop is another big plus. Later on in the drop, I think you overdid it with the short, staccato-y notes (like at 1:32), which disrupted the flow of the piece a bit in my opinion. I’m enjoying the breakdown section and the gradual build-up back into 2:33, although I think you could’ve done more to create variety in the second drop relative to the first one. I’ll also say that, despite the neat sound design and crisp and clear mix, the arrangement of the piece is a tad generic, and I would’ve liked to hear some more melodic content at some point. Still, you nailed the production quality, atmosphere, and progression of this one. Keep at it, Auphinity! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
8/10