00:00
00:00
TaintedLogic

2,716 Audio Reviews w/ Response

All 5,125 Reviews

1 reviews is hidden due to your filters.

I like the smooth, easygoing vibe at the beginning. However, I don’t think that vibe meshed very well with the vocals - there was a lot of vocal layering/chorus effects that gave the vocals a really gruff sound. It just seemed a little overdone in that regard. I don’t think my issue is with the vocals themselves, just the way they were mixed. They probably need to have the high-mids boosted a little, just to give them a bit more distinction and avoid the gruff overtone. The pacing is good, and I like the lyrics a lot. The mix could use some sharpening - the weak snare especially caught my attention. I really like the solos at around 2:28, but I think they drag on for a bit too long. The second half of the piece also doesn’t feel too climactic. I know this is a long piece already, but it felt like you ended it right after a verse - it just wasn’t very conclusive in its instrumental content. I’ve picked at some smaller details here, but overall I admire your organic sound design and sense of flow and harmony. Keep at it, Ceevro! :)

8.5/10

Ceevro responds:

Thanks. I lost by .03, which tells me that those tiny details can make all the difference!

I like piano at the beginning, although I think it could use some more reverb. The brass at :12 sounds pretty inauthentic, especially in the higher register. You clearly have a good sense of rhythm and harmony, though, and I liked the piano interlude at 1:32. I think the piece could sound a lot more varied in terms of energy and dynamics. At the same time, the structural elements of the texture were pretty variational, with not many repeating sections or themes woven throughout the piece. The composition is strong here overall, but unfortunately the cheap brass samples detracted from my enjoyment of it. Keep at it, AzulJazz! :)

8.5/10

AzulJazz responds:

Thanks a lot

I like the reverb and the little ornaments (like at :15). The melodies are beautiful, and I like the sense of progression too. This is what I was talking about with the lack of humanization, though - this piece sounds like you used a DAW to create it, even though the sample is pretty good. Incorporating some subtle variations in the tempo, note lengths, and the volume levels of individual notes will make this piece sound like it was played live, which is what I think you want with a piano solo. Also, don't be afraid to deliberately make some entire sections quieter or slower than others - emotional appeal is really important in pieces like this, and spacing things out a bit will help with that. Good luck! ;)

DJ-DG responds:

I actually did humanise it quite a bit... maybe it just didn't get through well...
Glad you like the melody and overall tune though!
And thanks for the review mate, really appreciate it!
-DJ-DG

The synths at the beginning are a little harsh-sounding and repetitive, and many of the other instruments sound generic, dry, and unpolished. The piece seems to be heading in a very different direction at 1:06 with the introduction of that bass riff. This piece has a lot of minimalism and dissonance, and overall not much melodic content at all. The sound design seems a bit arbitrary, and the structure is much too convoluted to keep the listener grounded. In the future, I’d highly recommend structuring your piece around a stronger melody. Your piece also needs a little more shape and structural coherence. Once you feel like you’ve done this, please PM me and I’ll leave you another review. Don’t be discouraged! You have a good sense of harmony, and your piece is fairly catchy. I think you went a little too experimental on this one, though. Keep at it, Vendros! :)

4.25/10

vendros responds:

I remember making this about 2 years ago and it was my best work then. I revisited my old tracks this year and have noticed most weren't mixed properly including this track which is why I stopped posting tracks. I completely agree with your review and will stick to your advice. Hopefully I might remaster these old tracks and expect new ones soon.
Thank you for the review ! :)

I like the cute riff at the beginning. The instrument that’s playing it sounds really thin, dry, and harsh, though. I’d suggest using an equalizer to eliminate some of the treble frequencies, and then give it some reverb. You clearly have a good sense of harmony. The brass instruments sound pretty inauthentic, and I think it would’ve been useful to include some drums in the piece to give it some energy and drive and help smooth over the transitions. The piece is also missing some low frequencies, and could potentially sound a lot richer with a bass or kick drum. Overall, the mood and harmonies are really enjoyable, and the piece is pretty well-structured and catchy. You seem to want some more help with mixing in the description for the song. Adding reverb and equalization at the very least is a good place to start. Compression is most commonly used for drums. No matter which DAW you use, I’m sure you can find somewhere online that tells you where to access these tools in your production software. As a priority, I’d suggest eliminating the low frequencies in every instrument except the bass and kick, but this makes the biggest different when you have a bass and kick in there in the first place. :)  Good luck, man! The composition is already strong. The sound design and mixing are my biggest concerns here. Keep at it, Zyg0te. ;)

7.25/10

P.S.: This is my 2,000th audio review on Newgrounds. :O

Zygotimus responds:

Very specific, very helpful, THANK YOU!!

The percussion at the beginning is interesting. The piece is a little slow to develop, though, but I like the synths and ominous mood. You really took the piece in a different direction starting at 1:39, which at first was a little jarring, but I see how it fits into the motifs of the piece shortly after. The drop at 2:32 was cool, and the melodies there, while repetitive, had a cool, quirky mood about them. I think the kick is a little weak, though, and might need a little more compression. Overall, the mixing is really clean though. The transition at 3:16 is also a little sudden. I did appreciate the variation in the harmonies at the second drop at 4:30. You wound down the energy well at the end. This is a well-structured and pretty smooth-flowing piece overall, and I especially like the sound design and mastering. Keep up the good work, Vdragonb! :)

8.75/10

Vdragonb responds:

Thanks :)

The busy beat and atmosphere feel like a bit of a strange combo at the beginning, and I think there’s some dissonance between the ambient pads and the synths that fade in at around :18. The drums sound nice and crisp, but the mood conveyed by the texture is a bit confusing. I like the climax into :52, but the string part there felt a little indistinct, further contributing to the bizarre mood of the piece. The mood then changes once again at 1:23, and immediately leaps back to the surreal ambience at 1:52. If you’re going to try to include various moods in your piece, I think you need to combine them in a more nuanced way. It can be really jarring to the listener to hear soothing and ominous sounds (for example) playing at the same time. I think part of the problem is that some of the riffs that are playing at the same time are in different keys. It can be hard to navigate complex harmonic themes without an extensive knowledge of music theory, but until you get more comfortable with layered harmonies I’d suggest making sure that all of the notes playing at once in your texture are in the chords you’re using. Pentatonic scales are usually a great place to start. Sorry if this review is really negative. The sound design of this piece is pretty cool, and it flows well too. Keep at it, TheMajician. :)

6/10

TheMajician responds:

Hey thanks for reviewing! This is my first year making music so I don't know much music theory, i have progressed since this song but I still don't know much. Thanks again!
Austin

The bass line is catchy, but the instrument at the beginning is really generic. I also wasn’t sure what the place of the static in the texture at :16 was. You have a good sense of harmony, although your synths sound pretty unpolished and dry. I think you need to do some more careful equalizing and also add some reverb. I liked the sense of climax into 1:20, and the drop at 1:24 was pretty enjoyable. However, I think the hi-hat is a little overpowering there - that’s a small detail, though. You could really use some reverb to fill out the texture more, although everything does sit pretty nicely in the mix at 1:24. The re-intro at 2:35 was a good idea, the subsequent climax was pretty dragged-out, lasting nearly 2 minutes. This piece is pretty well-structured and smooth-flowing, although in the future I want you to explore methods of creating variety besides just adding and subtracting instruments. Dynamic contrast, phrasing, and the like will help give your piece more emotional drive and shape. I was also a little thrown off by the climax at the end. I was at least expecting it to loop after that. Including some reverb might also help make that ending work better. Overall, it’s a pretty strong piece. I think the minimalism and sound design are the two most pressing issues I have with it. Otherwise, cool piece. Keep at it, TheFantasticZ. :)

7/10

TheFantasticZ responds:

Thanks :D

And I'll work on that stuff :P

Currently I'm using lmms.

I like the pulsing synths and drums at the beginning. The piece is a little slow to progress, but the mix is pretty clean. There are quite a few moments of minimalism, and I would’ve liked to hear some melodic content in the piece. The drum part could also have been more creative. By around the 3-minute mark, the piece is really repetitive. I appreciated the part at 2:48 for its structural relief, but I was a little thrown off by the filtering at 2:55. Overall, I really didn’t think the piece needed to be this long, either. The drop at 3:35 came on a bit suddenly, even though the pacing of the piece otherwise is very slow. A lot of your instruments also sound pretty generic. In the future, I’d strongly suggest structuring your piece around melodic content or at least a clearer emotional height. The near-uniform energy and repetition of the piece is a serious problem IMO. Don’t be discouraged, though. You have a good sense of harmony and flow. You just need to put a little more effort into the composition. Keep at it, TardisPeanutMusic. :)

5.5/10

Astedroid responds:

Okay. I have to learn more things on the music. But thanks.

Hi. I'm Andrew. Audio portal junkie since 2010, supporter since 2017. I always want to improve what I do! I make music, run the NGUAC, post poetry on BBS, and am the all-time #2 audio reviewer. I love this site, and I want to make it the best I can! ^_^

Andrew Mikula @TaintedLogic

Age 27, Male

Policy Research

Bates College

Wellesley, Massachusetts

Joined on 8/16/12

Level:
22
Exp Points:
5,122 / 5,380
Exp Rank:
9,723
Vote Power:
6.38 votes
Audio Scouts
10+
Rank:
Police Officer
Global Rank:
14,027
Blams:
63
Saves:
626
B/P Bonus:
10%
Whistle:
Silver
Trophies:
5
Medals:
142
Supporter:
7y 11m 7d
Gear:
1