TaintedLogic's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[microcosm]

Microcosm is a very good name for a song. It's almost like some soon-to-be-famous Newgrounder did it back in 2013. Catchy melodies as usual. The bass was a little too loud IMO, but the mastering is good. I think you overdid the reverb on the crash at 1:49. Well-structured, smooth-flowing, the usual suspects. Your endings are becoming increasingly less cringe-worthy. Also, good to see you branching out from that one genre you always make (sorry; I'm in a snarky mood today). Still, I like how it's upbeat, and it has a great sense of structural ebb and flow. Keep it up, Johnfn. ;)

johnfn responds:

Thanks TL! Actually, I write tons of non chipstep songs all the time, but I just never release them.

lol jk

Also I completely agree, Microcosm is the best name for a song!

[Volt]

Yeah. I remember listening to this one for the first time several months ago. It got my foot tapping immediately, and it still does. You usually master your tracks very loudly, but I think this one is especially crisp and clear. Well-structured, catchy and melodic. I thought you began to overuse the crashes at 1:15, but the drop at 1:45 was well worth the wait. I think my favorite part of the piece is actually 2:45, when the dichotomous characters (edgy and bass-heavy; blissful and melodic) both come through simultaneously. This piece has one of my favorite endings of any of your tracks, btw. It almost sounds sneaky, yet in a conclusive sort of way, as if the police finally show up and everyone at the party disperses and heads back to campus. XD Really admirable work. Keep it up, Kyle! :D

Lockyn responds:

Really glad you like the 2:45 section, 3:00 and onwards was definitely really really cool to construct. Ending was nice in my eyes too, loved using those light bell arp sounds! Thank you for the kind words, I'm glad you enjoyed :)

[EEK! + Lockyn - Glacier Galaxy]

Cool! You guys are the kings of quirky instruments. I especially like the vocal-sounding sample at :02. The frantic synth lines and build-ups are really enjoyable, and the drops were cool if a little overly intricate times (especially, for example, some of the little riff-breaks at 1:48 and other places). The mood changes very rapidly in this piece, and some of the transitions, such as 2:33 and 3:56, were somewhat jarring. That said, all of the instruments come through the mix very clearly. I suppose I would've liked to see you vary the build-up the 2nd time around. My main problem with the piece is that it's a little over-stimulating, given the several different prominent melodies in the track. Otherwise, I can tell a huge amount of effort went into this thing, and I think the title fits really well. Keep up the good work, both of you! ^^

Lockyn responds:

Thanks TL! Appreciate the comments and love. Agree on the second track, could be too much.

[Vapor]

When the bass at :15 comes through even my sh**ty laptop speakers, you know it packs some punch! I love the quirky instruments and atmosphere. The drop at 1:03 reminds me a lot of "Hiatus." I suppose I would've liked to hear the hi-hats more up-front in the mix, especially around 1:40. Still, I love how you implemented the piano bridge section at 2:20 or so. Well-structured, flowing, melodic, upbeat, and extremely catchy. You've definitely indulged the desires of the bass addicts, too! Production quality is superb. The ending was a little bizarre. It sounds to me like it ended on the iv chord, which is pretty unconventional (though I may be wrong). Regardless of my knowledge of music theory, nice track! ;)

Lockyn responds:

I'm glad you liked the piano, I was really happy with how most of it turned out this time around! It ended on vi, so I can see why it would sound a bit unfulfilled, yes definitely unconventional in terms of traditional music theory. I liked the open-sounding finish, so I went with it. Cheers :)

[Cs - 'Smash the Night']

The loop is smooth and the mood here is very bright and fun. I can tell it's mastered very loudly, and I can hear all of the instruments clearly. However, I think the snare is a little weak throughout the piece. I would've liked to hear a stronger off-beat (generally, the snare and/or clap should be the loudest sound in the mix). The melody is also a little all-over-the-place tonally. You display a good sense of harmony for the first half of the piece, and while there aren't any clashing notes or dissonances later on, the melody is a bit too frantic and involved for the casual listener to grasp onto it. It's just a little over-stimulating. I'd suggest repeating a couple of pitch patterns within the melodic section from :29 to the end, and simplifying the rhythm. That way, your melodies will be more memorable and catchy. Overall good work! Keep at it, Csucskos! ^^

Csucskos responds:

Yes. I've realised long time ago that I can't make catchy music. The reason is: I don't want to make too simple music. So I change the melody here and there, put some bonus instruments in, add a different melody to the bass than the main melody, twist the rhytm a bit and so on. After this I find that the whole song is a mess and there's no real melody. But for me everything is clear (or nearly ;D) because I've heard it many times during the making. This is the problem I guess... Simple but still valuable music making. It is hard. (I don't want to be cocky. I know that sometimes only the piano plays and the notes are all eighths. Hey, I'm lazy! I really don't feel the balance.)

Simplifying the rhythm... Last time you complained about the monotone rhythm, and now... ;) I'll look for the good balance anyways.

All in all I'm really grateful for your comments and I'm sure they will help me. Thank you.

[Cs - 'Bittersweet Dance']

Cute piece. I like how you alternate between major and minor chords. It has an interesting progression, but I'd caution you about having so many jarring changes in mood. Still, it has a clean sound and a nice sense of direction about it. The melody could use some more rhythmic variety, but overall the melody itself is enjoyable. Obviously, it needs to be more fleshed-out structurally, but you're well on your way to constructing a solid piece, my friend. ;) Keep it up!

Csucskos responds:

Thanks a lot!
I'm happy to hear that I'm getting better.
Still don't know what do you mean with 'fleshed-out structurally' but OK, next time will be some interesting rhytms. ;)
(Maybe not next time but the time after that.)

[3MBER - Strawberry Sky]

I like the pensive atmosphere at the beginning. It has a good sense of climax starting at :31. I wasn’t a huge fan of the vocal samples at :56, although some of the subtle filtering (1:12) was enjoyable. I like the drop at 1:22, and I think the mixing and mastering are generally strong. Those loud, crisp hats at 1:37 really added a lot to the texture as well. I think the drop is a little drawn-out, lasting for very nearly a full minute, and then you transition into this re-intro section at 2:17 rather abruptly. I appreciated the variations you had on the melody at 3:12, but that instrument is not my favorite and also gets a little distorted by the drums. I think you needed some side-chaining there. The piece also lacked conclusiveness IMO and needed more of a substantive outro to tie it together at the end. Still, I enjoyed the piece a lot overall. It has a lot of really cool percussive sounds and, perhaps with the exception of some minor structural and transitional details, the composition is really strong. The quirky mood is a big plus, and you did a good job of maintaining a full texture throughout. Keep it up, x3MbeRx. ;)

8.5/10

x3MbeRx responds:

I focused very heavily on sound design and mixing for this piece, and the arrangement suffered slightly because of it. Making a completely original track in just two weeks time is hard work for sure. Thank you for listening :)

[Memories]

I like the flowy, soothing piano. It has a great, human quality to it. Either you recorded this live or did some excellent work with the humanization, because I’m loving all the dynamic contrast, phrasing, and subtle tempo changes. At times it seems a little stumbly, such as at 1:55, but that’s a minor detail that just emphasizes the down-to-earth vibes even more. It has a great sense of structural ebb and flow. You did an excellent job of creating melodic development and structural variety. Compositionally, this is one of my favorite pieces of the round. All of the frequencies sit well in the mix, and you had an appropriate amount of reverb in there to make it sound airy and full-textured. To be honest, I’m a complete sucker for piano solo pieces, but at the same time, I might’ve expected you to take a few more risks for the Final Round: adding some string harmonies, an unorthodox key change or bridge, etc. That said, it’s hard to be overly critical because I’m swept away by this piece. Nice work! :D

9.5/10

sebastien01 responds:

Thank you very much for this review! I was going on a display of emotions on this song. I recorded an improvisation on my keyboard for around 1h30... Right after I oversaved on my project, in fact my song was supposed to be a D'n Bass composition. But whatever, I have to forget it now xD. It's still haunting me! haha

I've put my mind on this song. It's always when I come to a point where nothing else exists but my instrument and my imagination that I'm able to spread my feelings on my keyboard, a kind of state of trance. I don't know how to describe it better but I think the human feeling sound comes from there. I was lost in my mind when these notes came out :) But yeah I didn't play it exactly like it is right now, but all the notes stayed the same if I don't count some missed notes here and there. I corrected some flaws --and there are some more to get rid of on this version--, amplified some cresc. and Rubato, added the reverb, mixed the piano sound with two parallel eq and filter. Then I panned each of the freq/filter output to a compressor, having in mind to cover a large frequency range. I'm really glad you noticed this airy and full-textured piano sound resulting from the mix job :)

Adding some instruments and re-work on it is in my to do list. I would like to make a longer and fuller version, without the flaws I hear everytime I listen to it :P I seriously didn't expect this reaction from people and judges to this song, so the results are higher than what I expected. That's a nice prize for me :) Thank you very much for the good words and the contest! It just can get even bigger for the next year! :D Seriously you deserve the "contest master of the year" achievement! ;)

[At Peace]

I like the atmosphere and dreamy guitar at the beginning. It’s a little slow to progress, but I really enjoyed the phrasing once the string parts came in at :41. The string samples effectively channeled the mood of the piece, and the melodies at :57 are beautiful. The piece has a great sense of continuity about it, yet you also provided some structural variety at 1:46. I felt like you had my emotions dancing on puppet strings for the entire duration of the piece. You led up to 2:18 effectively, and the sense of climax and full texture there add a sense of overarching development and and finality to the piece that’s often missing in pieces submitted to this competition, even in the Final Round. The choral part that came in at around 3:10 also added a lot to the piece. I can’t hear any flaws with the mixing or mastering. This is an extremely well-structured and smooth-flowing track. This is exemplary work as far as I’m concerned, and if it were up to me alone you would win this competition. Keep up the inspiring work, Papkee! :D

10/10

papkee responds:

>Can't hear any flaws in mixing or mastering

Haha. Yeah. Sure.

Thanks for the review. I always love it when my hard work pays off.

[Deathmatch]

I like the dreamy and soothing intro. The slow wind-down and brief riser before the refrain at :34 was a creative idea that channeled the energy well. During the refrain, I wish you had brought out the piano melodies more than the arpeggios. It just seemed a little hard to get a grip on the melodic content as a listener there. The breakdown at 1:06 brings some very welcome structural variety. I like the danceable synth patterns at 1:22 a lot. The texture is full and engaging throughout, and the mastering quality is superb. The stop-start transition at 2:10 was well-orchestrated, even if it seemed uncharacteristic of what is otherwise a very flowy piece. Nice job bringing it full-circle with the smooth piano at 2:46. The fade-out itself seemed a bit lazily done, though. I also wished you had varied the melodies more during the 2nd refrain, especially since the harmonies are pretty uniform throughout the piece (the arpeggios are a near-constant presence in the mix, even during the breakdown section). The instruments blend well and help enhance the mood, even if they’re not entirely unique. Overall, this is a very enjoyable piece with a few minor details that could use improvement. Nice work, Noisysundae! ;)

8.5/10

Noisysundae responds:

Didn't expect the judges to like the breakdown that much. XD

I actually toned down the piano during the climax since it obstructs the arp which lacks mid and low. Should have done the panning on the arp instead, I guess. :/

This one was done just several hours before the deadline so indeed, the ending was lazily done. If only I got the idea of 3/4 DnB earlier...

Anyway, one thing I'm happy about making it quick is how it points out my weaknesses on music production more than when I have more time. Thanks for the review as usual, TL. Hope we'll meet again at the NGUAC '17! :D