TaintedLogic's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[static (feat. eleanor forte)]

I like the pensive piano riff at the beginning. The instrument itself sounds both dry and distorted, though - it could use some wet reverb to fill out the atmosphere and maybe some filtering or something to add variety. The percussion at :18 sounds similarly dry and minimal. I like the lyrics a lot, and the vocals themselves sound pretty realistic despite being a vocaloid. I’m also not sure I liked how you overlap the vocal phrases - it didn’t really seem to fit with the pacing of the piece up to that point. The added layering at :52 is really nice, although some more bass tones would’ve helped fill out the texture there more. The melancholic bridge at 1:10 was a bit of a missed opportunity to add some bolder melodies or a beat drop IMO. With the repetition towards the end of the piece, I feel like the composition of this piece in general was pretty underwhelming, despite being well-structured and having some cool melodies and sound design. I’d encourage you to find more ways of filling out the texture here and adding variety, whether that’s with mixing effects, additional instruments, more dynamic melodies, or otherwise. Still, the existential content of the vocals and the distorted sound design end up serving you well here. Keep at it, wheremakingthishapen! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
7/10

[Left Adrift]

I like the hardstyle lead at the beginning and the frantic synth harmonies. The mix is very loud and pretty clean, although sometimes the balance seems a bit off between the harmonies. For example, the synth riff at :28 seriously overwhelms the piano, and in general the drums could use a bit more of a boost in the mix. The main melody at :58 sounds a bit square rhythmically, and you also start overusing the riff at :53 a bit after a while. That said, I like the breakdown at 1:26, and you transition well back into the frantic harmonies at 1:48. The key changes at 2:10 and 2:30 were good for some variety, although I might’ve liked to see you switch up the harmonies themselves rather than just transpose them to different keys. The piece also probably could’ve used a proper outro, as it ends pretty suddenly. Still, this piece is catchy, energetic, and has some really cool retro sound design. You have a good sense of rhythm, harmony, and progression, and pretty much all of my complaints are nitpicks. Keep it up, VoltranixMusic! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
8.25/10

[Kore ga ai no sugata ka?]

I like the cute synths and jazzy pads at the beginning. The bouncy piano riff at :07 is really great, and I really love the blissful melodies at :14 too. The mixing here is strong, and the melodies have a nice and dynamic feel. The frantic piano line at :43, vocal sample/effect that comes in every measure during the refrain, and the high-pitched outro are other favorite compositional details of mine. If I had to complain about something, it might be that the drums could use a bit more creativity, and I also might’ve liked to see you vary the main melody the second time around at 1:22. That said, I really enjoy the sound design, production quality, melodies, and progression of this piece. Hard to go wrong with a track this upbeat and well-produced. Keep it up, VIVID91! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9.5/10

[Driving through memories]

I like the bass drone at the beginning. The synth at :01 is a bit cheesy, and could use some more atmosphere around it to help it blend in. The prominent drum rolls at :14 are really nice, but could use a bit of a boost in the mix, maybe with some more compression. The tranquil, bright-sounding section at :22 is also good, but could use some more bass tones to balance out the high-pitched synths.

Your melodies sound pretty jumpy and aimless at times - there are a lot of big jumps in pitch between notes, but at the same time there’s a lot of repetition in patterns that you’re using. During the entire last 2 minutes of the piece, the synth riff that first comes in at :39 serves as the lead melody - at some point, it might be a good idea to switch it up, either by having another instrument take the lead or by changing the note pattern that synth is playing in the first place.

The texture feels full and well-balanced during the bassy/climactic sections, and I appreciate how much effort you put into the drum patterns. That said, you really spam the crashes too much here, especially at 1:25. You have a good sense of rhythm, harmony, and progression, but some of the compositional/arrangement details of this piece could use some fleshing out. Still, the blissful mood and rich harmonies help keep me engaged here. Keep at it, VanillaSnope! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
6.25/10

VanillaSnope responds:

Wow! thanks for the helpful feedback! I've never received criticism like this before, so it helps a lot. I'm always learning and thanks to people like you I'm able to improve along the way. Thanks!

[Smooth Operator [demo]]

I like the rich atmosphere and soulful vocals at the beginning. The drum fill at :20 threw me off a bit at first, but I’m loving the gradual fade-in of the drums until :40 or so. The piece is a little slow to progress at first, but the sax solo at 1:01 really hits the spot. I would’ve liked to hear more of the sax in the mix, although the synth at 1:27 fills in nicely as a lead instrument. There are a lot of sudden transitions here, though, including back into the sax and vocal combo at 1:48. At times, the drums could use a boost in the mix too, especially towards the end. Overall, though, the production quality, sound design, and atmosphere are really strong here. The composition could use a bit more fleshing out, and the arrangement is a tad too choppy right now, but as a response to the author’s description here, yes, I want to hear a full-length version. Please PM me when you finish it. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
8.5/10

[a journeys end]

I like the catchy synth riff at the beginning. You overuse the open hat a bit, and some of the synths sound pretty cheesy, like the one at :22. You could also do a better job of transitioning between the sections of the piece - there are a lot of times where you add or subtract instruments without warning. At :56, the mix seems a bit oversaturated with reverb, to the extent that the harmonies sound a bit muddy. I’d suggest dialing back the wetness there. The bridge with the walking bass at 1:19 is cool, is a tad minimal, and you transition well back into the more energetic section at 1:45. Overall, you clearly have a good sense of harmony and rhythm. The piece could flow a tad smoother, though, and the production quality could be sharper at times. Still, this is a catchy piece with a rich atmosphere and some cool individual riffs. Keep at it, toad-shroom! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
7/10

toad-shroom responds:

Thanks for your input!

[Metropolitan Energy]

I like the descending piano line at the beginning. Unfortunately, MuseScore’s samples aren’t the best quality. The guitars and strings all sound pretty fake, and the drums probably need a boost in the mix (in most DAWs you can use a compressor to make drums sound louder). I like the frantic melodic content and upbeat mood, though, and despite the inauthentic sound design, the piece seems befitting of a video game soundtrack. The composition also gets a tad repetitive after a while, although the key change at 3:15 was a good idea. If you have access to another music production software (slightly outdated versions of Logic Pro sell for like $40), I’d suggest PM’ing @LD-W and joining the NG Audio Pub on Discord. The Resources tab there is full of great sample libraries and tips on where to find more. Still, this is a cute piece with some nice melodies and (unsurprisingly) a strong sense of energy and drive. Keep at it, TheGrassGuy! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.25/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
7.25/10

TheGrassGuy responds:

Should I use FL Studio? It's expensive though ($100, and I don't feel like pirating it). I've used the trial version before and it was somewhat convoluted. I know many of the Newgrounds OGs used Nexus, but not only is Nexus itself like $200, I've heard you also can't really make presets with it.

I actually intend on remastering this and adding vocals in the future. I like it. The "repetitive" part is actually a repeat sign for the second verse (which will have different lyrics once I add lyrics).

[Clash on Venus]

I like the cute, flashy synths at the beginning. The drums there could use a bit of a boost in the mix, though, maybe with some more compression. In fact, the entire mix is pretty quiet and subdued here. Some of the synths also sound a bit cheesy and unpolished, like the one at :26. That said, the upbeat mood and fun harmonies help maintain interest over time. The piece is missing some bass frequencies in the texture for a lot of time, though, and the harmonic content gets a tad repetitive after a while despite the variations in energy level. At 2:12, that one quirky pad has a few too many treble tones, I think - it sounds a little harsh, and might be a good candidate for a haircut in the EQ. The second half of the piece is also rather repetitive, both in terms of sound design and harmonies. I’d suggest switching up both at some point - i.e., using a new instrument for the melody and varying the melody itself to give the piece a stronger overarching sense of direction. The sound design does grow on me over the course of the piece, and despite the quiet mix the production quality holds up quite well here. Overall, solid work here, theDominus! Just needs a bit more variety (and also maybe a more prominent bass line). Keep at it, man. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
6.75/10

[The Way]

I like the gritty guitars at the beginning and the crisp drums that come in shortly thereafter. The tracks could use a bit of atmosphere around them - either some mixing effects like reverb or additional harmonies - but the wailing echoes at 1:10ish help scratch that itch to some extent. Some parts of the production sound a tad harsh, especially at 1:50, but overall this is a really well-produced track.

The composition is mostly smooth-flowing and well-structured, although admittedly the transition at 2:15 threw me off a bit. I like how the section at 2:15 was so melodic relative to the first half of the piece, although in general the piece could use some more dynamic melodies or a solo at some point. Some lyrics would be great as well. You bring the piece full-circle well by 3:08, although the guitar isn’t playing perfectly on beat there. I like the atmospheric outro too - has an eerie vibe that leaves an air of mystery to it.

Overall, this is a solid track that’s missing that “X factor” at times, but also has a solid production quality, enjoyable rhythmic content and progression, and some fun compositional details to add variety. Keep at it, TentoTheC! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
8/10

[caustic rain]

I like the crisp strings at the beginning and the rain sound effects. The glitchy beats at :11 are really cool, if a tad loud relative to the string lines. I also would’ve liked to hear some more reverb and other mixing effects on the drums to fill out the atmosphere a bit more. That said, the added harmonies and bass do that job themselves by :48, and I’m loving the intensity of that section in general. The following minute or so is pretty minimal, although the breakdown at 1:38 has a nice emotional appeal. At some point, the harmonies and rhythmic content of the harmonic content could’ve been a bit more variational, and overall the melodies don’t quite feel dynamic enough to suit the dramatic nature of the track. Again, the intensity at 2:23 is great, but the main melody is a pretty square half-quarter-quarter note pattern. You’ve definitely got a winning sound design combo between the soaring strings and gritty synth bass, and the rich textures and rhythmic density of the drums during the refrains are really nice, but overall the composition felt a bit stiff here in some ways. The production quality is impressive, though, even if the mix is a bit quiet overall. Still, this is a catchy, well-structured, and memorable track. Keep at it, Tarutrit! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.25/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
8/10