TaintedLogic's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[SUNSCREECH - rebirth]

I like the eerie atmosphere at the beginning. The distorted vocals definitely contribute to the creepy mood. The texture might need some thickening up at times to keep me engaged, especially during the first 1.5 minutes or so, but I did enjoy the swell into :52 and the airy piano riff at 1:17. The transition at 1:43 was surprisingly smooth considering what a rapid shift in the texture it is. The pacing of the piece is still rather slow, and at some point I would’ve liked to hear some more harmonic depth to balance out the gritty rhythmic content, but the mixing is impressive and the progression feels downright cinematic. If there’s one particularly jarring transition here, it’s at 2:55, although I feel like a drum fill or brief flourish would smooth it over more. I also enjoyed the climax into 3:47 and the return of the piano at 4:00. The skin-crawling wall of sound at 4:33 caught me by surprise a bit, but in retrospect you foreshadowed it well. Overall, I think the arrangement here is a bit disjointed, and the composition could be more well-rounded, but you absolutely told a story with this one, and I have a lot of respect for that. Sound design and production are very good as well. Thanks for coming out to the NGUAC this year, SUNSCREECH! Been a pleasure having you. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
8/10

[FACUNDO GARDIOL - Summer Fan ( Glitch Hop )]

I like the glitchy effects at the beginning and the blissful synths at :08. The mix is really loud and punchy, and the texture feels nice and full and well-balanced at :17. The melodies at :34 are really cutesy and fun, and you use the vocal samples well too. The rhythmic content of the piece absolutely rocks throughout, and the progression is smooth too. Some parts sound a tad over-compressed, like at 1:45 - very heavy sidechaining there. I also think you could’ve done more to offer some contrast in the energy levels. Seems like everything here that doesn’t have a really strong beat is a build-up leading into one. Aspects of the sound design are a bit generic, and later on the main harmonic riffs could use some more variation as well. All of that said, you absolutely nailed the production quality, upbeat mood, melodies, and arrangement of the piece. Seriously catchy and well-mastered content here, Spirali. And thanks for coming out to the NGUAC this year - been an absolute pleasure hearing your stuff. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
8.75/10

SPIRALi responds:

I love you!

[When it’s over (the bright future)]

I like the catchy beat at the beginning, although the claps at :03 really duck in and out of the mix with the atmosphere. Most of the rest of the sound design is really nice, though, and I’m also enjoying the rhythmic content. The peppy synth at :42 is great, as is the dreamy pad sequence at :55. Overall, the piece is very smooth-flowing, but also doesn’t really feel structurally complete. With a little more effort, it could make for a good loop, but it still could be a lot more dynamic and variational within these 97 seconds. Still, I love the danceability and the instrumentation here. Thanks for coming out to the NGUAC this year, Sirbru! Been a pleasure having you. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
7/10

[Obsidian Knight]

I like the cutesy synths at the beginning and the bassy atmosphere at :05. The rhythmic content is good, although the mix is a bit bottom-heavy throughout. Sounds like there’s some reverb on the bass too (or maybe it’s just extra juicy?). Either way, I’m tempted to say the sub takes up a bit too much of the mix. Getting serious Halloween-ish vibes from this. I like the sassy main synth riff, but I would’ve liked to see it get a boost in the mix, and maybe transposed up an octave or two just as a counterweight to the rest of the texture. The piece also gets rather repetitive after a while. It would certainly make for a good video game soundtrack, though. Overall, maybe not your best work, but I appreciate the risk-taking with the experimental texture and lo-fi mix. Been an absolute pleasure having you in the contest this year, Sednova! Best of luck with your future projects. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
6/10

[The Depths]

I like the eerie piano riff at the beginning. The texture sounds a bit minimal at first, and could at least use some more reverb or something to fill out the atmosphere. The snare sample is not my favorite, but the other sound design choices are nice. There’s a good sense of build-up into 1:03, but it ended up being a bit anticlimactic given the quirky synth riffs at 1:04. That said, I like the drop at 1:18 and the hip-hop-inspired drums at 1:50. In fact, one of my favorite aspects of the piece is how often you switch up the drum pattern. That’s an underrated way of creating variety, and you do it a lot here. That said, the mix sounds a bit over-compressed at times, and I would’ve liked to hear a bit more variety in the harmonic content, especially later on in the piece. I like the rich pads and grouchy bass during the last refrain at 3:30, though - that was a good way of hitting the piece home. The powerful chords and tempo automation during the outro were nice touches as well. Overall, I enjoyed the sound design, progression, rhythmic content, and compositional details here, but the production could’ve been a bit tighter and more organic-sounding, and the harmonies needed a tad more variety. Still, this piece is seriously catchy and fun - thanks for coming out to the NGUAC this year, Rici! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
8.25/10

[DEMONIC SAVIOUR]

I like the quirky synths and pads at the beginning. There’s a lot of overlap in the frequencies between the two main riffs at the beginning - maybe some stereo widening would help keep them more distinct in the mix? You could also just transpose one of them up or down the octave, respectively. You also go in a very different direction with this piece with the heavy guitars at :21. I like the solo at :42, and the transition at 1:00 was really neat. The way the crash cuts off at 1:05 sounds a bit unnatural, and then you transition pretty abruptly into the more downtempo section at 1:06. Overall, I think the pacing of this piece is way too fast. It’s just very jarring when the texture shifts so dramatically every 10 seconds or so. I think this piece would make for a nice, longer piece with some more gradual transitions and a better integration of all of these thematic elements and motifs, but right now it sounds like you just tried to cram way too many ideas into 2 minutes. Other than the choppy arrangement, I like the sound design and a lot of the individual riffs, including the cutesy pad/arpeggio combo at 1:43. This piece has a lot of potential, and I hope you’ll keep working on it! In the meantime, thanks for coming out to the NGUAC this year, recme! Been an absolute pleasure having you. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.75/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.25/1
Composite score
7/10

recme responds:

thank you for the critiques!!

i agree, the pacing was probably too fast. lately, i've been trying to avoid repeating parts too much in my compositions, and its very noticeable in this track, which i think actually damages it a bit. had i repeat some parts more, things wouldve most likely felt more normal.

i'd like to come back to this in the future! probably for another album idk. for now though, time is better spent on newer projects... though this was a great learning experience! thanks for your review!

[A Fighter's Song]

I like the edgy guitar riff at the beginning - that glissando on the high note is especially nice. The vocals are soulful and powerful, but also a bit dry in the mix - some more reverb and other effects might help give them a bit more presence and help with the blending on the different vocal layers. I was a little thrown off that the vocals seem to be so much more up-front in the texture during some of the verses than they are at the chorus (compare :55 and 1:33, for example). The drums could also use more presence in the mix at times. The lyrics themselves are really good - love the dark and cryptic feel of the piece in general. The passion in the vocals at 1:33 was especially nice, though. Love the conversational tone they have too. The short-lived breakdown/hook combo at 2:07 was another highlight - that struck me as a really creative way of speeding up the pacing on an otherwise pretty traditional arrangement. The solo at 3:01 is awesome, as is the spacey riff at 3:36. Overall, there’s a lot to like here, Mischa. All of my complaints are minor, but as always you’re doing some major shredding on this track, with some heartfelt vocals and a nice progression to boot. It’s been a pleasure having you in the NGUAC this year! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9/10

Mischa-head responds:

Thanks for the feedback! And thanks for hosting the audio contests! I've had so much fun participating, definitely keen for next time!

[The Great Adventure]

I like the rich strings at the beginning. It’s a tad difficult to follow the rhythm until the big cadence at :09, but after that the piece is very smooth-flowing. Love the orchestral sound design and melodies, too. I wanted to hear more of the percussion in the mix, but otherwise the production is clean and well-balanced. The composition is full of variety, and has a lot of lovely twists and turns, like the woodwind flourish at 1:30 and the string solo at 1:50. If I had to complain about something composition-wise, it might be that you could’ve done more with dynamic contrast and phrasing - the energy level is fairly constant throughout. That said, you absolutely nailed the whimsical, upbeat mood, memorable and dynamic melodies, and well-varied instrumentation here. Thoroughly enjoyable track, Manvineo! And thanks for coming out to the NGUAC this year. It’s been an absolute pleasure having you. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9.25/10

[Run Away]

I like the apprehensive mood and gritty synths at the beginning. The way you integrated the vocal samples was neat - reminds me of Waterflame, actually. The drop at 1:00 is actually a nice break from the frantic, in-your-face synths, even if it’s a tad minimal. The production quality holds up well, although the drums could’ve used a bit of a boost in the mix at times, and some more upper-mid range frequencies could’ve helped round out the texture a bit. The lo-fi bridge at 2:02 is probably my favorite part of the piece, and the melodies at 2:51 really help hit the piece home nicely - great moment of catharsis towards the end of the piece. Overall, I’m really impressed with this piece. It’s bouncy, fun, and the texture is very unique and experimental. Congratulations on your success in this competition, KayozKun! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
9.5/10

[Listen]

I like the tranquil mood at the beginning and the rich atmosphere. The dense percussion pattern is a nice touch too. Really lovely harmonies, and strong production quality here. I think the composition could’ve been fleshed out a bit more, though - I wanted to hear some more dynamic melodic content and some more “twists and turns” in the structure. Still, you nailed the sound design, atmosphere, and mood here. This is a really soothing piece, and I hope you’ll consider making a full-length version sometime! Also, thanks for coming out to the NGUAC this year, Kassich - it’s been a pleasure having you. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.75/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.5/1
Composite score
8/10

Kassich responds:

Thank you for the review, and thank you for hosting/organizing the NGUAC. I love this competition, it gives me an opportunity to just write music for fun and listen to other fellow composers!