TaintedLogic's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[Dimension (NGUAC 2024 Final Round)]

I like the rich atmosphere at the beginning. The drums are not my favorite - the clap sounds a bit unpolished, and the percussion riff at :15 is a bit dry in the mix. The pacing of the piece starting at around :40 is pretty cool - lots of twists and turns in the build-up to 1:19. The chirping effect at :55 is really neat, although admittedly the pause at 1:11 threw me off a bit. The drop is catchy, if a tad minimal, and ideally I think the clap would be a bit punchier in the mix. In general, the mix is clean, if a tad over-compressed. I like the atmosphere at the breakdown and the gradual fade-in of the bouncy synth riff that really gets its chance to shine at 2:18. The transition at 2:48 is a bit sudden, but I like the squeaky rhythmic riff there and the build-up into 3:17. I think you start to overuse the stop-start transitions at this point, but I appreciate that you switched up the drop the second time around. The thick bass and airy pads during the outro are really nice. Overall, solid work, Whymsical! Thanks for coming out to the NGUAC, and hope to see you back next year. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
8.5/10

whymsical responds:

thanks for inviting me here! had tons of fun, wish to participate next year!

[okay for now]

I like the tranquility and sound design of this one. Has a nice lo-fi flavor during the second half. If you ever flesh this out into a full-length track, send me a PM. I’ll leave you a proper review. Until then, thanks for coming out to the NGUAC! Hope to see you back next year. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
7/10

[BASS CAN]

I like a lot of the sound design choices here, between the airy pads and mischievous-sounding bass. There’s a tad too much reverb in the texture for my tastes, especially at the beginning - it actually makes it hard to follow the rhythm at first. There’s a good sense of build-up into :35, and the drop is catchy and quirky-sounding. The chopped vocals are especially cool. The mix is clean and punchy, but a bit over-compressed at times. The pads and higher-pitched synths sound pretty harsh, almost like you have them panned to both ears but not in the middle (that may or may not actually be the case; the point is that they take up too much of the soundscape). The second half of this piece could use a bit more variety compared to the first half, including some more memorably harmonic riffs. That said, this piece is really catchy and the instrumentation is super flashy and unique. Solid work overall - just be sure to rein in some of these volume levels next time. Thanks for coming out to the NGUAC, TurboDrivee. Hope to see you back next year. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.5/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
8/10

[Tropical Surge]

I like the quirky rhythmic emphasis at the beginning and the airy pads. The bass riff at :17 is catchy, and has a nice call-and-response going on with the dreamy synth lead. The jumpy melody at 1:02 is also cool, and the texture really attains something that feels “stable” at 1:19. The darker tone at 1:33 is good for some variety, and I really like the shape of the final phrase at 1:50, where the intensity level and register of the melody gradually increase. This piece felt like it could use one last climactic part towards the end to tie it together, although I like the unique structure and experimental details of the texture. Strong production quality overall, too. Beautiful piece, TheNormalMusic! Tropical Surge is a very fitting title. This piece sounds distinctly watery and light. Thanks for coming out to the NGUAC. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
9.5/10

TheNormalMusic responds:

Woah, almost hit the ceiling! Well, the judging must've been hard in the top 20...
Thank You so much for running these contests. I'm surprised there are people who can organize and run them.
See You next year!

[Ecnelupo [NGUAC]]

I like the moody chords at the beginning and the mellow percussion. The mix is a bit quiet, and the drums in particular could use a tad more compression so that they cut through the texture during some of the busier sections. The atmosphere is great, though, and the structure feels really loose and fluid. There are some moments of dissonance, like at 1:38, but they also fit the off-the-cuff character of the piece really well. I’m generally skeptical of full-length tracks that rely on the same fairly repetitive harmonic framework all the way through, but you pull this off quite well with how variational the melodies and sound design are. The fade-out at the end felt like a bit of an underwhelming way to end the piece, though - this piece is full of tension, and at some point I wanted to see it resolved, even if it was in a brief cadence at the end. This track would also make a great loop IMO. Overall, really solid work here, Staintocton! Some people just use brass instruments and call it jazz, but you’re a true jazz musician’s jazz musician! Keep it up, and thanks for coming out to the NGUAC. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.5/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
2/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
9.25/10

[Don't Be Afraid]

I like the tranquil mood at the beginning. The piece is a little slow to progress at first, but it definitely has some forward momentum by :34, and the drop at :45 has a nice, cathartic feel. The mix is clean and clear, but a tad over-compressed, and the snare sounds simultaneously very loud and a bit too thin. The breakdown at 1:29 was a good way of “resetting” the piece, and the piano echo of the main melody at 1:40 was a nice touch. The piano bridge feels a tad dragged-out, and could definitely use a countermelody or at least some more ebb and flow, but I like the mini-build-up into 2:25 and the transition back into the second refrain at 2:47. The second refrain could also use a bit more variety the second time around, but I do like the high-register tonic chord that plays right at 2:47. Sounds super cathartic.

Overall, I like the upbeat mood, melodies, and production quality of this piece. The arrangement and aspects of the sound design are a bit generic, and later on the composition could use some more variety. That said, it’s also really catchy, and the melody stuck in my head for a while after the first listen. :) Thanks for coming out to the NGUAC, SpeedoRH! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.75/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.5/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
1/1
Composite score
8.25/10

SpeedoRH responds:

Thanks for the review! I do agree that some of the elements are a little over-compressed, but I actually never noticed the snare's thinness before for some strange reason.

I also agree that the structure and sound design is definitely very simple: I'm going through a phase where rather than taking structural inspiration from other works, I make my own. Same with sound design. I'm not sure if you mean the word "generic" as in "simple" or "boring", but either way I agree that my sound design wasn't particularly complex, and I'll keep working on that! ;D

Huge thanks to you and everyone involved in NGUAC for the opportunity by the way! :)

[Bit My Finger :(]

I like the pensive mood at the beginning. There’s a nice rich atmosphere and some cute, airy synths. The piece is a tad slow to progress, and the drums are a tad soft at first. The refrain at :42 is catchy, if a tad cliche, and I think the main melody could use a bit of a boost in the mix vis a vis the pads and bass. The quirky texture of the post-chorus at 1:04 is nice, and you definitely return this piece to its atmospheric roots there. The more frantic arpeggios at 1:40 were a great way of transitioning the piece into the high-energy section at 1:47. The final minute of the piece sounds a bit dragged out, and could use some more “shape” to keep it interesting - filtering automations, or other small compositional details during transitory moments. The mix is probably my main concern here; it just could sound a lot more punchy and crisp with some more compression, especially on the drums and lead melodies. At times, the frequency ranges of the synths also feel a bit overly constrained, so maybe you could play with giving the lead instrument a boost in the upper-mid range, especially during the breakdown from 1:04 to 1:47. Still, I really like the sound design, melodies, progression, and atmosphere of this one. Thanks for coming out to the NGUAC, SpecialGuacs! Hope to see you back next year. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
8/10

[Equivocal]

I like the wave-like piano riff at the beginning and the bright, even tone of the piece at :21. At times, the piece could be a bit more expressive, and it especially sounds a bit understated during the first minute, but that begins changing at around :56. The softer tone at 1:26 is good for some variety, and the strumming effect of the more fast-paced arpeggios at 2:02 is really lovely. Combined with the slower pace of the chords, the strumming harmonies create a great call-and-response effect. The extended cadence at the end is a nice touch as well. I think the piece could use a more distinct “point of arrival” towards the end to add some closure. The melody line at 2:19 sounds pretty cathartic, but also a bit…again, the word that comes to mind is understated. Still, I really like how the piece is structured, the balance of frequencies, and a lot of the individual motifs. Really strong work overall, Solacitude! Thanks for coming out to the NGUAC. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.5/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9.25/10

Solacitude responds:

I had a hard time to come up with something I deemed good enough to post for the final.
I produced a bunch of garbage during this period before getting to this piece.

I think I get what you mean by understated, it might lack a little bit of development of certain motives that I could've built more complexity over, instead of jumping to another motif too quickly. I could make it more thought out, it's quite simple themes that could evolve more in complexity, harmonizing better, adding voices to the part after 2:00. The end I also thought it felt a bit rushed.... Oh well it was rushed! :) I went for an improvisational ending that truly could be better. I went for modulations going into chords that are not heard anywhere else in the piece so it can easily sound off to some listeners I think.. After 2:00 it was all done the last day up until the last hours before deadline. In the end the reception is quite a lot better than what I anticipated though!

I continue to work on this one, and will maybe post the final result in here, but under another title, to keep this one intact so it always fits the comments and score related to the contest.

Thank you very much for the review and kind words! And even more for hosting the NGUAC and all it involves! It's surely a lot of time you dedicate to it, and I feel like it has to be said, thank you for giving musicians this opportunity to test our ability to compose!

[Sicra - Orbital [NGUAC]]

I like the atmosphere at the beginning and the cool synth guitar lead at :17. The distorted vocal samples at :38 are a nice touch, and there’s a good sense of build-up into 1:07. The pacing of the middle section of the piece is a bit bizarre - there are a lot of different ideas, but none of them feel very “stable,” so it’s hard to follow the direction of the piece, if that makes sense. Also, the mix is very bottom-heavy. By the time the guitar comes in at 1:58, I was itching for some more harmonic content. That said, the ghostly melodies at 2:14 hit the piece home nicely, and the rich atmosphere and plethora of reverb there truly give that section an otherworldly feel. Maybe the astronauts have crashed on a strange planet and encountered an alien race?

Either way, the production quality is top-notch here, and I can tell you spent a lot of effort crafting some of these transitions. The arrangement is indeed very experimental, but overall you pull it off quite well. The composition could use a tad bit of fleshing out in a way - you move on from one idea to the next very quickly for a lot of this piece, and the final refrain in particular felt a bit short-lived. Still, there’s a very strong sense of storytelling with this one. Really evocative work. Thanks for coming out to the NGUAC, Sicra! ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
2/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
1/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.5/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
1/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
9/10

SicraMusic responds:

Appreciate the long review! The drop in the middle is by far the most experimental part of the song, but I somehow got used to it though while producing. It's this trap I frequently fall into where rhythmic and melodic patterns start sounding familiar when you listen to them a lot, but they still sounds weird on the first listen, you just no longer realize it.

[Rise of the Ancient Empire]

I like the somewhat somber mood at the beginning. The dynamics pattern in the low brass is a bit strange - there’s a huge emphasis on the very first note, and the next 3 notes are rather muffled before the tonic comes in again. The brass instruments you’re using here in general sound pretty inauthentic, although I like the composition. The melodies are memorable and blend well with the atmosphere. The mixing could also use some help, though. I can barely hear the strings when the brass is playing. On the plus side production-wise, the drums sound nice and crisp in the mix. The airy bridge at 1:45 was good for some variety, and had some neat percussive effects early on. The choir at 2:40 was a nice touch, although the way the choir chords duck under the mix right after the note ends (as opposed to gradually fading away with reverb) makes them sound a bit unnatural. Overall, the composition is solid here, but the sound design and the mixing could both use a bit more polish. That said, thanks for coming out for the NGUAC, satanicpotatoe! Hope to see you back next year. ^_^

Mixing, mastering, and balance
1.25/2
Structure, transitions, phrasing, and variety
1.25/1.5
Melody, tonality, harmony, and texture
1.75/2
Instrumentation and sound design
.5/1
Emotion, atmosphere, and catchiness
1.25/1.5
Originality and uniqueness
.75/1
Overall (how do the elements above interact?)
.75/1
Composite score
7.5/10